StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Azure DevOps vs Bitbucket

Azure DevOps vs Bitbucket

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stacks41.1K
Followers33.4K
Votes2.8K
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.9K
Votes249

Azure DevOps vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Azure DevOps is Microsoft's all-in-one DevOps platform for planning, building, testing, and deploying applications, offering version control, CI/CD pipelines, and project management. Bitbucket is a Git-based code hosting platform that focuses on code management, version control, and team collaboration with a web-based interface and pull request workflows. Let's explore the key differences between Azure DevOps and Bitbucket:

  1. Integrated Platform: Azure DevOps is a comprehensive platform that provides end-to-end application lifecycle management. It includes tools for source control (Azure Repos), project management (Azure Boards), build and release management (Azure Pipelines), and automated testing (Azure Test Plans). Bitbucket, on the other hand, primarily focuses on source code management and offers features like Git repositories, pull requests, and code review. While Bitbucket integrates with other tools for CI/CD, issue tracking, and project management, it does not provide the same level of integration and breadth of features as Azure DevOps.

  2. Scalability and Flexibility: Azure DevOps is a scalable platform that can handle projects of any size. It offers built-in scalability and supports parallel execution of pipelines, enabling efficient build and release management. Azure DevOps also provides flexibility in terms of supported programming languages and platforms, allowing developers to build and deploy applications across various environments. Bitbucket, while suitable for small to medium-sized teams, may have limitations in scalability and may require additional configuration or plugins to support larger projects and complex workflows.

  3. Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem: Azure DevOps is tightly integrated with other Microsoft tools and services, such as Azure cloud services, Visual Studio IDE, and Microsoft Teams. This integration enables seamless collaboration, enhanced deployment options, and deeper integration with Microsoft's development ecosystem. Bitbucket, being a standalone product, offers integrations with a variety of third-party tools and services but may not have the same level of integration with the Microsoft ecosystem.

  4. Pricing and Licensing: Azure DevOps pricing is based on a consumption model, where users are billed based on the number of users and the usage of various features. It offers different pricing tiers, including a free tier for small teams. Bitbucket, on the other hand, offers a pricing model based on the number of users, with different pricing plans based on the team size and additional features required.

In summary, Azure DevOps provides a comprehensive platform for application lifecycle management with features like source control, project management, build and release management, and testing. It offers scalability, integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, and flexibility across programming languages and platforms. Bitbucket, on the other hand, focuses primarily on source code management and provides integrations with third-party tools for CI/CD and project management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Azure DevOps

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Oct 12, 2019

Decided

We needed to introduce DevOps framework into our Solution delivery space . The first assignment is to choose the right tools that will fit into our environment and also take advantage of our existing investment. We decided to go for Azure DevOps because we can use our existing subscriptions of Azure to power it.

The main reason I prefer Azure DevOps is because of the completeness of the offering. It’s not just a way to get your code deployed. They’ve got bug tracking, testing, integration to lots of other tools, fantastic documentation and more. It’s a very complete solution with a huge amount of flexibility. You can work with it completely in the cloud, or in a hybrid way with some work done locally and some in the cloud. It makes it really easy to integrate with international teams, remote work, and tons more.

Having an integrated solution is a little easier than trying to stitch together multiple disparate tools. It may not be best of breed in every category, but you have a very complete, and reasonably mature, set of tools to work with, making implementing it very easy and very effective. Today, we are more productive with Version Control Management, Continuous Integration, Automated Release and Provisioning. We deliver faster and rollback safely. No more firefighting.

Oladipupo Oluremi(Head, Enterprise Architecture, DevOps & Quality Assurance)

22.3k views22.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial
Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards; Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI; Git: free private repositories, pull requests; Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics; Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux; Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing; Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails; Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products; Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages; IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio; Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
Statistics
Stacks
41.1K
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
33.4K
Followers
2.9K
Votes
2.8K
Votes
249
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 905
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 349
    Nice ui and tools
  • 342
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
Cons
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
Pros
  • 56
    Complete and powerful
  • 32
    Huge extension ecosystem
  • 27
    Azure integration
  • 26
    One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI
  • 26
    Flexible and powerful
Cons
  • 8
    Still dependant on C# for agents
  • 5
    Half Baked
  • 5
    Many in devops disregard MS altogether
  • 4
    Jack of all trades, master of none
  • 4
    Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile
Integrations
Git
Git
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
Sentry
Sentry
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
npm
npm
Trello
Trello
Slack
Slack
Confluence
Confluence
Docker
Docker
Jira
Jira
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Docker
Docker
Slack
Slack
Trello
Trello
Git
Git
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Jenkins
Jenkins
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Azure DevOps?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Confluence

Confluence

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Redmine

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana