Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?
Azure DevOps is Microsoft's all-in-one DevOps platform for planning, building, testing, and deploying applications, offering version control, CI/CD pipelines, and project management. Bitbucket is a Git-based code hosting platform that focuses on code management, version control, and team collaboration with a web-based interface and pull request workflows. Let's explore the key differences between Azure DevOps and Bitbucket:
Integrated Platform: Azure DevOps is a comprehensive platform that provides end-to-end application lifecycle management. It includes tools for source control (Azure Repos), project management (Azure Boards), build and release management (Azure Pipelines), and automated testing (Azure Test Plans). Bitbucket, on the other hand, primarily focuses on source code management and offers features like Git repositories, pull requests, and code review. While Bitbucket integrates with other tools for CI/CD, issue tracking, and project management, it does not provide the same level of integration and breadth of features as Azure DevOps.
Scalability and Flexibility: Azure DevOps is a scalable platform that can handle projects of any size. It offers built-in scalability and supports parallel execution of pipelines, enabling efficient build and release management. Azure DevOps also provides flexibility in terms of supported programming languages and platforms, allowing developers to build and deploy applications across various environments. Bitbucket, while suitable for small to medium-sized teams, may have limitations in scalability and may require additional configuration or plugins to support larger projects and complex workflows.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem: Azure DevOps is tightly integrated with other Microsoft tools and services, such as Azure cloud services, Visual Studio IDE, and Microsoft Teams. This integration enables seamless collaboration, enhanced deployment options, and deeper integration with Microsoft's development ecosystem. Bitbucket, being a standalone product, offers integrations with a variety of third-party tools and services but may not have the same level of integration with the Microsoft ecosystem.
Pricing and Licensing: Azure DevOps pricing is based on a consumption model, where users are billed based on the number of users and the usage of various features. It offers different pricing tiers, including a free tier for small teams. Bitbucket, on the other hand, offers a pricing model based on the number of users, with different pricing plans based on the team size and additional features required.
In summary, Azure DevOps provides a comprehensive platform for application lifecycle management with features like source control, project management, build and release management, and testing. It offers scalability, integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, and flexibility across programming languages and platforms. Bitbucket, on the other hand, focuses primarily on source code management and provides integrations with third-party tools for CI/CD and project management.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i
is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
We needed to introduce DevOps framework into our Solution delivery space . The first assignment is to choose the right tools that will fit into our environment and also take advantage of our existing investment. We decided to go for Azure DevOps because we can use our existing subscriptions of Azure to power it.
The main reason I prefer Azure DevOps is because of the completeness of the offering. It’s not just a way to get your code deployed. They’ve got bug tracking, testing, integration to lots of other tools, fantastic documentation and more. It’s a very complete solution with a huge amount of flexibility. You can work with it completely in the cloud, or in a hybrid way with some work done locally and some in the cloud. It makes it really easy to integrate with international teams, remote work, and tons more.
Having an integrated solution is a little easier than trying to stitch together multiple disparate tools. It may not be best of breed in every category, but you have a very complete, and reasonably mature, set of tools to work with, making implementing it very easy and very effective. Today, we are more productive with Version Control Management, Continuous Integration, Automated Release and Provisioning. We deliver faster and rollback safely. No more firefighting.
Oladipupo Oluremi(Head, Enterprise Architecture, DevOps & Quality Assurance)
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos905
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools349
- Unlimited private repositories342
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Source Code Insight7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Mercurial Support2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- Academic license program2
- IAM integration2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1