Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs Github Actions: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Azure DevOps and GitHub Actions
1. Azure DevOps: Azure DevOps is a comprehensive set of development tools provided by Microsoft for software development, including project management, version control, build and release management, and testing capabilities.
2. GitHub Actions: GitHub Actions is a workflow automation tool that allows developers to automate their software workflows directly from their repositories on GitHub. It enables developers to build, test, and deploy code without having to switch between multiple tools or platforms.
3. Integration with platforms: Azure DevOps provides extensive integration with various Microsoft services such as Azure, Visual Studio, and other third-party tools. This integration allows for seamless collaboration and consistency across different stages of the software development lifecycle. On the other hand, GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with GitHub and allows developers to leverage the power of the extensive ecosystem and community-driven actions available on the platform.
4. Configuration and setup: Azure DevOps requires additional configuration and setup to create and manage pipelines, workflows, and release processes. It provides a graphical interface for setting up pipelines and managing deployment configurations. In contrast, GitHub Actions uses YAML-based configuration files directly in the repository, making it easier to define and version control workflows alongside the code.
5. Marketplace extensions: Azure DevOps offers a wide range of marketplace extensions that can be used to enhance the capabilities of the platform, including integration with popular tools and services. These extensions can be easily installed and configured to customize the development process. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, provides a rich ecosystem of community-driven actions that can be shared and reused across different workflows without the need for additional marketplace extensions.
6. Pricing and licensing: Azure DevOps offers both free and paid plans, with different levels of features and capabilities. The pricing is based on the number of users and the resources used. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, provides a certain amount of free usage for public repositories and offers additional minutes for workflows in private repositories with paid plans. Pricing is based on the number of concurrent workflows and the size of the repository.
In summary, Azure DevOps is a comprehensive set of development tools provided by Microsoft, with extensive integration options and flexible configuration. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, is a lightweight, GitHub-centric workflow automation tool that offers seamless integration with the GitHub repository and a rich ecosystem of community-driven actions.
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of GitHub Actions
- Integration with GitHub8
- Free5
- Easy to duplicate a workflow3
- Ready actions in Marketplace3
- Configs stored in .github2
- Docker Support2
- Read actions in Marketplace2
- Active Development Roadmap1
- Fast1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1
Cons of GitHub Actions
- Lacking [skip ci]5
- Lacking allow failure4
- Lacking job specific badges3
- No ssh login to servers2
- No Deployment Projects1
- No manual launch1