Azure DevOps vs Go.CD

Overview

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

Azure DevOps

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.9K

Votes249

Azure DevOps vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Azure DevOps and Go.CD, it is important to understand the key differences between these two popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous delivery.

Hosting Options: Azure DevOps is a cloud-based service provided by Microsoft, offering a fully managed solution with no installation required. On the other hand, Go.CD is an open-source tool that can be self-hosted on-premises or in the cloud, giving users more control over their environment and infrastructure.
Integration Capabilities: Azure DevOps has seamless integration with other Microsoft products such as Azure Cloud, Visual Studio, and GitHub. It also supports a wide range of third-party plugins. In contrast, Go.CD has a plugin ecosystem that allows users to integrate with various tools and services, but may not have the same level of integration with Microsoft products.
Scalability and Extensibility: Azure DevOps is known for its scalability, supporting large enterprise teams with complex projects. It offers a range of features such as pipelines, boards, and test plans that can be customized to fit different workflows. While Go.CD is also scalable and extensible, it may require more configuration and setup to accommodate complex projects compared to Azure DevOps.
User Interface and User Experience: Azure DevOps provides a user-friendly interface with intuitive navigation, making it easy for both developers and non-technical users to collaborate on projects. In contrast, Go.CD has a more technical interface that may require some training for users to fully understand and utilize its features effectively.
Licensing and Pricing: Azure DevOps offers a range of pricing plans, including a free tier for small teams and individuals, as well as paid plans with additional features and resources. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, is free to use but may incur costs for hosting and maintenance, depending on the user's deployment preferences.
Community Support and Documentation: Azure DevOps has a large community of users and extensive documentation provided by Microsoft, offering resources and support for troubleshooting and learning about the platform. While Go.CD also has an active community and documentation, the level of support may vary compared to Azure DevOps.

In Summary, Azure DevOps and Go.CD differ in hosting options, integration capabilities, scalability, user interface, licensing, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GoCD, Azure DevOps

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GoCD	Azure DevOps
GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.	Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.	Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards; Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI; Git: free private repositories, pull requests; Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics; Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux; Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing; Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails; Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products; Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages; IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio; Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 980	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 205	Stacks 2.7K
Followers 325	Followers 2.9K
Votes 207	Votes 249
Pros & Cons
Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Lack of plugins 2 Horrible ui 1 No support	Pros 56 Complete and powerful 32 Huge extension ecosystem 27 Azure integration 26 Flexible and powerful 26 One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI Cons 8 Still dependant on C# for agents 5 Half Baked 5 Many in devops disregard MS altogether 4 Not a requirements management tool 4 Jack of all trades, master of none
Integrations
Docker Kubernetes Slack	GitHub Visual Studio Docker Slack Trello Git IntelliJ IDEA Jenkins Octopus Deploy Eclipse

What are some alternatives to GoCD, Azure DevOps?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Azure DevOps vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Azure DevOps and Go.CD, it is important to understand the key differences between these two popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous delivery.

Hosting Options: Azure DevOps is a cloud-based service provided by Microsoft, offering a fully managed solution with no installation required. On the other hand, Go.CD is an open-source tool that can be self-hosted on-premises or in the cloud, giving users more control over their environment and infrastructure.
Integration Capabilities: Azure DevOps has seamless integration with other Microsoft products such as Azure Cloud, Visual Studio, and GitHub. It also supports a wide range of third-party plugins. In contrast, Go.CD has a plugin ecosystem that allows users to integrate with various tools and services, but may not have the same level of integration with Microsoft products.
Scalability and Extensibility: Azure DevOps is known for its scalability, supporting large enterprise teams with complex projects. It offers a range of features such as pipelines, boards, and test plans that can be customized to fit different workflows. While Go.CD is also scalable and extensible, it may require more configuration and setup to accommodate complex projects compared to Azure DevOps.
User Interface and User Experience: Azure DevOps provides a user-friendly interface with intuitive navigation, making it easy for both developers and non-technical users to collaborate on projects. In contrast, Go.CD has a more technical interface that may require some training for users to fully understand and utilize its features effectively.
Licensing and Pricing: Azure DevOps offers a range of pricing plans, including a free tier for small teams and individuals, as well as paid plans with additional features and resources. Go.CD, being an open-source tool, is free to use but may incur costs for hosting and maintenance, depending on the user's deployment preferences.
Community Support and Documentation: Azure DevOps has a large community of users and extensive documentation provided by Microsoft, offering resources and support for troubleshooting and learning about the platform. While Go.CD also has an active community and documentation, the level of support may vary compared to Azure DevOps.

In Summary, Azure DevOps and Go.CD differ in hosting options, integration capabilities, scalability, user interface, licensing, and community support.