StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Azure Monitor vs NetData

Azure Monitor vs NetData

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Netdata
Netdata
Stacks226
Followers392
Votes82
Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor
Stacks60
Followers184
Votes0

Azure Monitor vs NetData: What are the differences?

Azure Monitor vs NetData

< Write introduction here >

1. **Data Collection**: Azure Monitor collects data from various Azure resources, applications, and other sources within the Azure ecosystem, providing a centralized repository for monitoring data. NetData, on the other hand, focuses on monitoring system metrics in real-time, giving granular details about server performance, networking, and more.
   
2. **Scalability**: Azure Monitor is highly scalable, capable of handling massive amounts of data and monitoring resources across a large enterprise environment. NetData is more suitable for small to medium-sized environments due to its lightweight nature and minimal impact on system resources.

3. **Alerting and Notifications**: Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with Azure's alerting and notification systems, allowing for customized alert rules and actions based on various metrics and conditions. NetData also offers alerting capabilities but may require additional setup and configurations compared to Azure Monitor.

4. **Visualization and Dashboards**: Azure Monitor provides comprehensive visualization tools and customizable dashboards for monitoring data, allowing users to create informative and interactive charts and graphs. NetData offers real-time visualization of system metrics through a web-based dashboard, providing a detailed overview of server performance at a glance.

5. **Cost**: Azure Monitor is a part of the Azure cloud platform and may incur costs based on usage and the number of monitored resources. NetData, on the other hand, is an open-source tool that is free to use, making it a cost-effective solution for organizations looking to monitor their systems without additional expenses.

6. **Integration**: Azure Monitor offers seamless integration with other Azure services and tools, making it easier to incorporate monitoring data into existing workflows and processes within the Azure ecosystem. NetData, being an independent monitoring tool, may require additional configurations for integration with third-party services or platforms.

In Summary, Azure Monitor and NetData differ in terms of data collection, scalability, alerting capabilities, visualization tools, cost, and integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Netdata
Netdata
Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

It provides sophisticated tools for collecting and analyzing telemetry that allow you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud and on-premises resources and applications.

Free, open-source; Easy installation and configuration; Access to monitoring unlimited metrics; Prebuilt dashboards and alarms; alerts on any metric, for a single host, an entire cluster, or your entire infrastructure; Tools for team collaboration; 800+ integrations
Store and analyze all your operational telemetry in a centralized, fully managed, scalable data store that’s optimized for performance and cost; Test your hypotheses and reveal hidden patterns using the advanced analytic engine, interactive query language, and built-in machine learning constructs; Integrate with popular DevOps, issue management, IT service management, and security information and event management tools
Statistics
Stacks
226
Stacks
60
Followers
392
Followers
184
Votes
82
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Free
  • 14
    Easy setup
  • 12
    Graphs are interactive
  • 9
    Montiors datasbases
  • 9
    Well maintained on github
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
CouchDB
CouchDB
ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ
Logstash
Logstash
Fail2ban
Fail2ban
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Windows
Windows
Grafana
Grafana
MongoDB
MongoDB
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Jira
Jira
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
BindPlane
BindPlane

What are some alternatives to Netdata, Azure Monitor?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana