StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure Pipelines vs Bitbucket Pipelines

Azure Pipelines vs Bitbucket Pipelines

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Stacks350
Followers368
Votes0
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs Bitbucket Pipelines: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Azure Pipelines and Bitbucket Pipelines.

  1. Deployment Capabilities: Azure Pipelines and Bitbucket Pipelines differ in their deployment capabilities. Azure Pipelines offers a wide range of deployment options and integrations with various platforms such as Azure, Kubernetes, and AWS. On the other hand, Bitbucket Pipelines has limited deployment options and is primarily focused on deploying to its own platform, Bitbucket.

  2. Build Agents: Azure Pipelines and Bitbucket Pipelines have different options for build agents. Azure Pipelines provides a hosted agent pool, where Microsoft manages and maintains the agents. Bitbucket Pipelines, on the other hand, requires users to provide their own build agents either on-premise or on a cloud provider.

  3. Integration with Code Repositories: Azure Pipelines and Bitbucket Pipelines integrate with different code repositories. Azure Pipelines seamlessly integrates with Git repositories, including Azure Repos, GitHub, and Bitbucket. Bitbucket Pipelines, as the name suggests, is tightly integrated with Bitbucket and doesn't have extensive support for other code repositories.

  4. Pricing Structure: Azure Pipelines and Bitbucket Pipelines have different pricing structures. Azure Pipelines offers a generous free tier with unlimited minutes for open-source projects, and also provides convenient pricing plans for private projects. Bitbucket Pipelines, on the other hand, offers a limited free tier with a fixed number of minutes per month, and additional minutes need to be purchased.

  5. YAML Configuration: Azure Pipelines and Bitbucket Pipelines differ in their YAML configuration capabilities. Azure Pipelines supports more detailed and advanced YAML configurations, allowing users to define complex build and deployment pipelines. Bitbucket Pipelines has a simpler YAML configuration structure, which may be more suitable for users looking for a less complex setup.

  6. Third-Party Integrations: Azure Pipelines and Bitbucket Pipelines integrate with different third-party tools. Azure Pipelines has a wide range of integrations with popular tools and services such as Slack, JIRA, and SonarCloud. Bitbucket Pipelines has a more limited set of integrations, primarily focused on Atlassian products such as JIRA and Confluence.

In Summary, Azure Pipelines and Bitbucket Pipelines differ in their deployment capabilities, build agents, integration with code repositories, pricing structure, YAML configuration, and third-party integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bitbucket Pipelines, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines

It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;
Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
Stacks
350
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
368
Followers
457
Votes
0
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 2
    Docker support
  • 2
    Yaml support
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket Pipelines, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana