StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure Pipelines vs Concourse

Azure Pipelines vs Concourse

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Concourse
Concourse
Stacks254
Followers393
Votes54
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks870
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs Concourse: What are the differences?

Azure Pipelines vs Concourse

Azure Pipelines and Concourse are both popular continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools used in software development. Although they serve the same purpose, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: Azure Pipelines is a cloud-hosted solution provided by Microsoft, while Concourse is an open-source, self-hosted CI/CD platform. This means that Azure Pipelines is managed and maintained by Microsoft, making it easier to set up and use without worrying about infrastructure management. On the other hand, Concourse provides more flexibility and control as you have complete ownership and control over the platform.

  2. Language Support: Azure Pipelines supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, including .NET, Java, Python, Node.js, and more. It provides built-in tasks and templates for these languages, making it easier to automate build and deployment processes. Concourse, being open-source, also supports multiple languages, but the setup and configuration may require more manual customization.

  3. Integration Ecosystem: Azure Pipelines seamlessly integrates with various development and collaboration tools such as GitHub, Bitbucket, Jira, Slack, and Azure DevOps itself. This integration allows for deeper integration and automation in the CI/CD workflows. Concourse, being a self-hosted platform, can also be integrated with external tools, but the level of integrations and available plugins may be limited compared to Azure Pipelines.

  4. Pipeline Configuration: Azure Pipelines uses a YAML-based configuration, allowing teams to define their CI/CD pipelines as code. This makes it easier to version control, review, and audit changes to the pipeline configuration. Concourse, on the other hand, uses a declarative configuration approach, where pipelines are defined using YAML files. While both approaches have their advantages, YAML-based configurations provide more flexibility and control over the pipeline definition.

  5. Scaling and Parallelism: Azure Pipelines offers built-in scaling and parallelism features, allowing teams to execute multiple jobs and stages concurrently to speed up the overall build and deployment process. Concourse also supports parallelism by allowing multiple tasks to run concurrently, but the scaling and parallel execution need to be managed manually as part of the infrastructure setup.

  6. Pricing Model: Azure Pipelines offers a flexible pricing model, including a generous free tier for open-source projects and limited parallel jobs. Additional parallel jobs and other features can be purchased through various pricing plans. Concourse, being open-source, is free to use, but the cost of infrastructure and maintenance needs to be considered when using it on a self-hosted environment.

In summary, Azure Pipelines is a cloud-hosted CI/CD solution with strong integrations, language support, and scaling capabilities, while Concourse is an open-source, self-hosted platform that offers more flexibility and control over the infrastructure. The choice between the two depends on factors such as preference for managed or self-hosted services, level of customization required, and the specific needs of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Concourse, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
veera
veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Concourse
Concourse
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines

Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

-
Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
870
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
254
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
393
Followers
457
Votes
54
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Real pipelines
  • 10
    Containerised builds
  • 9
    Flexible engine
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 2
    Docker support
  • 2
    Yaml support
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava

What are some alternatives to Concourse, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana