Azure Pipelines vs GoCD

Overview

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

Azure Pipelines

Stacks2.3K

Followers457

Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs GoCD: What are the differences?

Introduction

Two popular continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools are Azure Pipelines and GoCD. While both tools aim to assist in automating the software delivery process, they have some key differences. This article will highlight the main differences between Azure Pipelines and GoCD.

Deployment Options: One key difference between Azure Pipelines and GoCD is the deployment options they offer. Azure Pipelines provides a wide range of deployment options including Azure App Service, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), Azure Functions, and more. On the other hand, GoCD focuses more on general purpose deployment and can be used with any platform or infrastructure.
Ease of Use: Azure Pipelines is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive configuration, making it easy for teams to set up and manage their CI/CD pipelines. GoCD, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise to configure and manage.
Integration with Azure Services: As a product of Microsoft, Azure Pipelines seamlessly integrates with other Azure services, providing additional functionalities and ease of use for developers who are already using Azure. GoCD, while versatile, doesn't have the same level of integration with Azure services.
Plugin Ecosystem: Azure Pipelines has a rich plugin ecosystem, offering a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be used to extend its functionalities and integrate with third-party tools. GoCD also has a plugin ecosystem, but it may not be as extensive as Azure Pipelines.
Pricing: Azure Pipelines offers a generous free tier, allowing teams to have up to 10 concurrent jobs with unlimited minutes per month. Additional pricing options are available for teams with higher demands. GoCD, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is free to use, making it a cost-effective option for teams with limited budgets.
Scalability: Azure Pipelines is highly scalable and can handle a large number of build and release pipelines simultaneously. It can be easily scaled up or down based on the needs of the team. GoCD, while scalable, may require more manual configuration and setup to handle a high volume of pipelines.

In summary, Azure Pipelines offers a wide range of deployment options, seamless integration with Azure services, and a user-friendly interface, while GoCD is a versatile tool with a strong focus on general-purpose deployment, a cost-effective option, and a robust open-source community. The choice between the two tools ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GoCD, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GoCD	Azure Pipelines
GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.	Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.
Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.	Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 980	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 205	Stacks 2.3K
Followers 325	Followers 457
Votes 207	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Lack of plugins 2 Horrible ui 1 No support	Pros 4 Easy to get started 3 Built by Microsoft 3 Unlimited CI/CD minutes 2 Yaml support 2 Docker support
Integrations
Docker Kubernetes Slack	.NET Core Slack Python Ruby Kubernetes .NET Node.js Linux Microsoft Azure RxJava

What are some alternatives to GoCD, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Azure Pipelines vs GoCD: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deployment Options: One key difference between Azure Pipelines and GoCD is the deployment options they offer. Azure Pipelines provides a wide range of deployment options including Azure App Service, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), Azure Functions, and more. On the other hand, GoCD focuses more on general purpose deployment and can be used with any platform or infrastructure.
Ease of Use: Azure Pipelines is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive configuration, making it easy for teams to set up and manage their CI/CD pipelines. GoCD, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise to configure and manage.
Integration with Azure Services: As a product of Microsoft, Azure Pipelines seamlessly integrates with other Azure services, providing additional functionalities and ease of use for developers who are already using Azure. GoCD, while versatile, doesn't have the same level of integration with Azure services.
Plugin Ecosystem: Azure Pipelines has a rich plugin ecosystem, offering a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be used to extend its functionalities and integrate with third-party tools. GoCD also has a plugin ecosystem, but it may not be as extensive as Azure Pipelines.
Pricing: Azure Pipelines offers a generous free tier, allowing teams to have up to 10 concurrent jobs with unlimited minutes per month. Additional pricing options are available for teams with higher demands. GoCD, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is free to use, making it a cost-effective option for teams with limited budgets.
Scalability: Azure Pipelines is highly scalable and can handle a large number of build and release pipelines simultaneously. It can be easily scaled up or down based on the needs of the team. GoCD, while scalable, may require more manual configuration and setup to handle a high volume of pipelines.

Azure Pipelines vs GoCD

Overview