StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure Pipelines vs Jenkins X

Azure Pipelines vs Jenkins X

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Stacks147
Followers370
Votes16
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks800
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Azure Pipelines and Jenkins X.

  1. Integration with Cloud Providers: Azure Pipelines is tightly integrated with Microsoft's Azure cloud platform, providing seamless integration for continuous integration and deployment processes within the Azure ecosystem. On the other hand, Jenkins X is designed specifically for Kubernetes and cloud-native applications, offering native support for Kubernetes clusters and cloud providers like AWS and Google Cloud Platform.

  2. Built-in DevOps workflows: Azure Pipelines offers out-of-the-box DevOps workflows for building, testing, and deploying applications across multiple platforms and languages with minimal configuration required. In contrast, Jenkins X is built with a focus on delivering cloud-native continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) workflows for Kubernetes applications, including GitOps best practices, automated versioning, and promoting immutable infrastructure.

  3. GitOps Practices: Jenkins X emphasizes GitOps practices by using Git repositories as the source of truth for infrastructure and application deployments. Changes to the infrastructure or application configuration are versioned in Git, enabling teams to collaborate effectively and ensuring consistent deployments across environments. Azure Pipelines, while supporting integration with Git repositories, may require more manual configuration to implement GitOps practices effectively.

  4. Automated Pipeline Management: Azure Pipelines provides a user-friendly interface for creating and managing pipelines through a visual designer or YAML configurations. It offers features like scheduled triggers, approval gates, and multi-stage deployments for complex CI/CD workflows. Jenkins X, on the other hand, focuses on automating the entire pipeline lifecycle, from code to production, by leveraging tools like Helm charts and Kubernetes operators for managing releases and environments.

  5. Containerized Workflows: Jenkins X is optimized for containerized workflows, where applications run in isolated containers within Kubernetes clusters. It uses Docker containers for packaging applications and Helm charts for managing the deployment of containerized applications. Azure Pipelines also supports containerized workflows but may require additional setup for integrating with Kubernetes clusters and managing container deployments effectively.

  6. Support for Serverless Deployments: Azure Pipelines provides seamless integration with Azure Functions, enabling developers to build, test, and deploy serverless functions as part of their CI/CD pipelines. Jenkins X, while not directly focused on serverless deployments, can be customized to support serverless applications by integrating with serverless platforms like AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Functions.

In Summary, Azure Pipelines and Jenkins X differ in their integration with cloud providers, built-in DevOps workflows, emphasis on GitOps practices, automated pipeline management, containerized workflows, and support for serverless deployments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins X, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
800
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
147
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
370
Followers
457
Votes
16
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps
Cons
  • 1
    Complexity
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 2
    Docker support
  • 2
    Yaml support
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
macOS
macOS
Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava

What are some alternatives to Jenkins X, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana