Azure Pipelines vs TeamCity

Overview

TeamCity

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.1K

Votes316

Azure Pipelines

Stacks2.3K

Followers457

Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Azure Pipelines and TeamCity, two popular continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools. Both tools offer robust features for automating build, test, and deployment processes in software development projects.

Deployment Options: Azure Pipelines is a cloud-based CI/CD service provided by Microsoft as part of the Azure DevOps suite. It allows developers to build, test, and deploy applications on various platforms such as Azure, Kubernetes, and more. On the other hand, TeamCity is a self-hosted CI/CD server that can be installed on-premises or in a private cloud environment. It provides flexibility in deployment options, allowing organizations to have complete control over their infrastructure.
Integration with Other Tools: Azure Pipelines integrates seamlessly with other Azure services such as Azure Repos, Azure Boards, and Azure Artifacts. This tight integration enables end-to-end traceability and enhances collaboration between development, operations, and other teams. TeamCity integrates with various popular tools and services like GitHub, Jira, Docker, and Slack, providing a wide range of options for integrating with a team's existing ecosystem.
Scalability and Pricing Model: Azure Pipelines offers a scalable cloud infrastructure that automatically scales resources based on the workload. It provides a flexible pricing model where users can choose between a limited free tier or pay based on the number of parallel pipelines and usage. TeamCity's scalability depends on the hardware infrastructure where it is deployed. It follows a per-server license model, which may require additional costs for scaling the infrastructure.
Configuration and Customization: Azure Pipelines uses YAML-based configuration files to define pipelines as code. This approach allows for version control, code reviews, and easy collaboration. TeamCity provides a web-based GUI for configuration and customization, which is convenient for non-technical users and teams looking for a graphical interface.
Built-in Testing and Monitoring: Azure Pipelines offers built-in support for running tests and generating test reports. It also provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools like Selenium, NUnit, and Jest. TeamCity also supports running tests but may require additional configuration and setup. It provides detailed build logs and build history, allowing users to monitor the status and performance of their builds.
Extensibility and Community Support: Azure Pipelines provides a rich marketplace with a wide range of extensions and integrations developed by Microsoft and the community. These extensions enhance the capabilities of pipelines and enable integration with third-party tools. TeamCity also has a vibrant community with various plugins and integrations available for extending its functionality.

In summary, Azure Pipelines is a cloud-based CI/CD service with a focus on Azure ecosystem integration, scalability, and flexible pricing. TeamCity, on the other hand, is a self-hosted CI/CD server that offers customizability, integration with popular tools, and a strong community support. The choice between the two tools depends on factors like deployment preferences, existing infrastructure, integration requirements, and development team's skill set.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on TeamCity, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity	Azure Pipelines
TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.	Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.
Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;	Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
Stacks 1.2K	Stacks 2.3K
Followers 1.1K	Followers 457
Votes 316	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 61 Easy to configure 37 Reliable and high-quality 32 On premise 32 User friendly 32 Github integration Cons 3 High costs for more than three build agents 2 User friendly 2 Proprietary 2 User-friendly	Pros 4 Easy to get started 3 Built by Microsoft 3 Unlimited CI/CD minutes 2 Docker support 2 Yaml support
Integrations
Slack	.NET Core Slack Python Ruby Kubernetes .NET Node.js Linux Microsoft Azure RxJava

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Azure Pipelines vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deployment Options: Azure Pipelines is a cloud-based CI/CD service provided by Microsoft as part of the Azure DevOps suite. It allows developers to build, test, and deploy applications on various platforms such as Azure, Kubernetes, and more. On the other hand, TeamCity is a self-hosted CI/CD server that can be installed on-premises or in a private cloud environment. It provides flexibility in deployment options, allowing organizations to have complete control over their infrastructure.
Integration with Other Tools: Azure Pipelines integrates seamlessly with other Azure services such as Azure Repos, Azure Boards, and Azure Artifacts. This tight integration enables end-to-end traceability and enhances collaboration between development, operations, and other teams. TeamCity integrates with various popular tools and services like GitHub, Jira, Docker, and Slack, providing a wide range of options for integrating with a team's existing ecosystem.
Scalability and Pricing Model: Azure Pipelines offers a scalable cloud infrastructure that automatically scales resources based on the workload. It provides a flexible pricing model where users can choose between a limited free tier or pay based on the number of parallel pipelines and usage. TeamCity's scalability depends on the hardware infrastructure where it is deployed. It follows a per-server license model, which may require additional costs for scaling the infrastructure.
Configuration and Customization: Azure Pipelines uses YAML-based configuration files to define pipelines as code. This approach allows for version control, code reviews, and easy collaboration. TeamCity provides a web-based GUI for configuration and customization, which is convenient for non-technical users and teams looking for a graphical interface.
Built-in Testing and Monitoring: Azure Pipelines offers built-in support for running tests and generating test reports. It also provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools like Selenium, NUnit, and Jest. TeamCity also supports running tests but may require additional configuration and setup. It provides detailed build logs and build history, allowing users to monitor the status and performance of their builds.
Extensibility and Community Support: Azure Pipelines provides a rich marketplace with a wide range of extensions and integrations developed by Microsoft and the community. These extensions enhance the capabilities of pipelines and enable integration with third-party tools. TeamCity also has a vibrant community with various plugins and integrations available for extending its functionality.

Azure Pipelines vs TeamCity

Overview

Azure Pipelines vs TeamCity: What are the differences?