StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Azure Storage vs PostGIS

Azure Storage vs PostGIS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Stacks1.3K
Followers787
Votes52
PostGIS
PostGIS
Stacks379
Followers377
Votes30
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks407

Azure Storage vs PostGIS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Azure Storage and PostGIS. Both Azure Storage and PostGIS are widely used for storing and managing geospatial data, but they have some significant differences in terms of functionality and features.

  1. Scalability and Availability: Azure Storage is a cloud-based storage solution provided by Microsoft Azure. It offers high scalability and availability for storing and accessing large volumes of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. On the other hand, PostGIS is a spatial database extender for PostgreSQL, which provides advanced geospatial capabilities within the PostgreSQL database engine. While both Azure Storage and PostGIS are designed to scale, Azure Storage offers automatic scaling and redundancy across multiple data centers, whereas scaling and replication in PostGIS require manual configuration and management.

  2. Spatial Data Types and Functions: One of the key differences between Azure Storage and PostGIS is the support for different spatial data types and functions. Azure Storage supports basic geospatial data types such as points, lines, and polygons, along with a limited set of geospatial functions for querying and analyzing the data. PostGIS, on the other hand, provides a rich set of advanced spatial data types and functions, including support for complex geometries, spatial indexing, and spatial analysis operations. This makes PostGIS more suitable for complex geospatial applications that require advanced spatial analysis capabilities.

  3. Indexing and Query Optimization: Another important difference between Azure Storage and PostGIS is the indexing and query optimization capabilities. Azure Storage uses a schema-less design and does not natively support spatial indexing. It relies on external indexing services like Azure Search or Elasticsearch for enabling efficient spatial queries. On the other hand, PostGIS provides built-in spatial indexing support, which allows for efficient spatial querying and indexing of spatial data. This makes PostGIS a better choice for applications that require fast and efficient spatial queries.

  4. Data Storage Format: Azure Storage uses a distributed file system to store data. It supports various data formats, including JSON, XML, and binary blobs, for storing structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. PostGIS, on the other hand, stores spatial data in a relational database format using tables, rows, and columns. This makes it easier to integrate with other relational databases and perform SQL-based operations on the data. However, Azure Storage offers more flexibility in terms of data format and can handle a wide variety of data types.

  5. Data Transfer and Replication: Azure Storage provides built-in support for data transfer and replication between different regions and data centers, making it easy to replicate and synchronize data across multiple locations. This makes it suitable for global applications that require geo-redundancy and high availability. PostGIS, on the other hand, does not have native support for data replication and synchronization. Replicating and synchronizing data in PostGIS requires additional configuration and management.

  6. Pricing and Cost: The pricing models for Azure Storage and PostGIS differ significantly. Azure Storage offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the amount of storage used and the number of transactions performed. It also provides different tiers with varying levels of performance and durability. PostGIS, on the other hand, is open-source software and can be used free of charge. However, it requires additional hardware and infrastructure to set up and maintain a PostgreSQL database with PostGIS extension, which may incur additional costs.

In summary, Azure Storage and PostGIS differ in terms of scalability, spatial data types and functions, indexing and query optimization, data storage format, data transfer and replication, and pricing and cost. Azure Storage provides a scalable and highly available cloud-based storage solution with basic geospatial capabilities, while PostGIS offers advanced geospatial capabilities within a PostgreSQL database engine. The choice between Azure Storage and PostGIS depends on the specific requirements and complexities of the geospatial application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
PostGIS
PostGIS

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

PostGIS is a spatial database extender for PostgreSQL object-relational database. It adds support for geographic objects allowing location queries to be run in SQL.

Blobs, Tables, Queues, and Files;Highly scalable;Durable & highly available;Premium Storage;Designed for developers
Processing and analytic functions for both vector and raster data for splicing, dicing, morphing, reclassifying, and collecting/unioning with the power of SQL;raster map algebra for fine-grained raster processing;Spatial reprojection SQL callable functions for both vector and raster data;Support for importing / exporting ESRI shapefile vector data via both commandline and GUI packaged tools and support for more formats via other 3rd-party Open Source tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
407
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
379
Followers
787
Followers
377
Votes
52
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
  • 2
    Cost-effective
Cons
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
Pros
  • 25
    De facto GIS in SQL
  • 5
    Good Documentation
Integrations
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Azure Storage, PostGIS?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

dbForge Studio for MySQL

dbForge Studio for MySQL

It is the universal MySQL and MariaDB client for database management, administration and development. With the help of this intelligent MySQL client the work with data and code has become easier and more convenient. This tool provides utilities to compare, synchronize, and backup MySQL databases with scheduling, and gives possibility to analyze and report MySQL tables data.

dbForge Studio for Oracle

dbForge Studio for Oracle

It is a powerful integrated development environment (IDE) which helps Oracle SQL developers to increase PL/SQL coding speed, provides versatile data editing tools for managing in-database and external data.

dbForge Studio for PostgreSQL

dbForge Studio for PostgreSQL

It is a GUI tool for database development and management. The IDE for PostgreSQL allows users to create, develop, and execute queries, edit and adjust the code to their requirements in a convenient and user-friendly interface.

dbForge Studio for SQL Server

dbForge Studio for SQL Server

It is a powerful IDE for SQL Server management, administration, development, data reporting and analysis. The tool will help SQL developers to manage databases, version-control database changes in popular source control systems, speed up routine tasks, as well, as to make complex database changes.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Liquibase

Liquibase

Liquibase is th leading open-source tool for database schema change management. Liquibase helps teams track, version, and deploy database schema and logic changes so they can automate their database code process with their app code process.

Sequel Pro

Sequel Pro

Sequel Pro is a fast, easy-to-use Mac database management application for working with MySQL databases.

DBeaver

DBeaver

It is a free multi-platform database tool for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators and analysts. Supports all popular databases: MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Oracle, DB2, SQL Server, Sybase, Teradata, MongoDB, Cassandra, Redis, etc.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase