StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Bamboo vs Webpack

Bamboo vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17

Bamboo vs Webpack: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Bamboo and Webpack are both popular tools used in web development for building and managing applications. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that developers should be aware of.

1. **Build Automation**:
Bamboo primarily focuses on continuous integration and deployment, providing features for automating build and release processes. On the other hand, Webpack is a module bundler that helps in optimizing the JavaScript code and its dependencies.

2. **Customization and Configuration**:
Bamboo offers a variety of built-in functionalities and configurations for managing build pipelines, whereas Webpack provides extensive customization options for configuring module bundling, code splitting, and optimizations through its configuration file.

3. **Native Support**:
Bamboo is a product of Atlassian and integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian products like JIRA and Bitbucket for end-to-end application lifecycle management. Webpack, being an open-source tool, has a strong community support with plugins and loaders available for extending its functionalities.

4. **Performance Optimization**:
Webpack is known for its ability to optimize front-end assets by bundling, minification, and tree-shaking to reduce the size of the final output. Bamboo, while capable of automating the deployment process efficiently, may not offer the same level of performance optimization for web assets.

5. **Ease of Use**:
Bamboo is designed to be user-friendly, with a graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the setup of build plans and deployment pipelines. Webpack, although powerful, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its configuration-driven approach and command-line interface.

6. **Community Support and Ecosystem**:
Webpack has a larger community of developers and contributors, offering a wide range of plugins, loaders, and tools to enhance its functionality. Bamboo, being a proprietary tool, may have limitations in terms of community-contributed extensions and customizations.

In Summary, Bamboo focuses on continuous integration and deployment with a user-friendly GUI, while Webpack is a powerful module bundler with extensive customization options and a thriving open-source community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, Bamboo

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
Bamboo
Bamboo

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
504
Followers
28.1K
Followers
549
Votes
752
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Low community support
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat

What are some alternatives to Webpack, Bamboo?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana