Overview

Beanstalk

Stacks85

Followers270

Votes51

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Beanstalk vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Beanstalk and GitLab are both web-based code hosting platforms that provide version control for developers. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

Pricing Model: Beanstalk offers a simple pricing model based on the number of users, repositories, and storage needed, with different plans for different team sizes. On the other hand, GitLab offers a flexible pricing model, providing options for self-hosted or cloud-hosted plans, and allowing unlimited users and repositories for the self-hosted version.
Built-In CI/CD: GitLab comes with a built-in Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipeline, allowing developers to automate the testing, building, and deployment of their applications. Beanstalk, on the other hand, does not have a built-in CI/CD feature and requires integration with other tools like Jenkins or CircleCI.
Collaboration Features: GitLab offers robust collaboration features, including project management tools, issue tracking, and code reviews. It allows teams to collaborate efficiently within the platform, making it easier to manage projects and communicate with team members. Beanstalk, on the other hand, lacks these collaboration features, focusing primarily on code version control.
Enterprise-Grade Security: GitLab provides enterprise-grade security features such as code scanning, vulnerability management, and access controls. These advanced security measures ensure the integrity and protection of the codebase. Beanstalk, although secure, does not offer the same level of advanced security features as GitLab.
Deployment Environments: GitLab allows developers to manage multiple deployment environments and easily configure them for different stages of the development process, such as development, staging, and production. This makes it easier to deploy applications with different configurations. Beanstalk, on the other hand, does not have a built-in deployment environment management feature.
Community and Support: GitLab has a large and active community of users, making it easier to find support, tutorials, and plugins. Additionally, GitLab offers comprehensive documentation and professional support options. Beanstalk, while offering support and documentation, may have a smaller community and fewer available resources compared to GitLab.

In summary, GitLab offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich platform compared to Beanstalk. It provides a flexible pricing model, built-in CI/CD, collaboration tools, advanced security features, deployment environment management, and a larger community and support network.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on Beanstalk, GitLab

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

623k views623k

Comments

Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Beanstalk	GitLab
A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.	GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Setup and manage repositories- Import or create Subversion and Git repositories that are instantly available to your team.;Invite team members, partners & clients- Restrict access to certain repos and provide read-only or full read/write permissions.;Browse files and changes- Every version of every file you’ve committed to Beanstalk is just a click away. See a timeline of who made changes and view the differences between revisions. Syntax highlighting for over 70 languages.;Preview, Compare & Share- Instantly preview HTML and image files in Beanstalk, compare versions side by side, and share them with your team, colleagues or clients, even if they don’t have a Beanstalk account.;Code Editing- Make and commit changes directly in the web interface of Beanstalk.;Blame Tool- View the line-by-line history of every file using Beanstalk's blame tool. Quickly see who was responsible for each line of code and which revision it belonged to.;Instantly deploy static assets from Beanstalk to your development, staging and production servers via Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files, Heroku, DreamObjects;	Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 85	Stacks 63.4K
Followers 270	Followers 54.5K
Votes 51	Votes 2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Ftp deploy 9 Deployment 8 Easy to navigate 4 Integrations 4 HipChat Integration	Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature
Integrations
Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront Basecamp Campfire FogBugz Lighthouse Harvest Zendesk HipChat Bugify	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Beanstalk, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.