StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Beanstalk vs Jenkins

Beanstalk vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Beanstalk
Beanstalk
Stacks85
Followers270
Votes51
Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K

Beanstalk vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Beanstalk and Jenkins.

  1. Deployment Platform and Use Case: Beanstalk is a fully managed deployment platform provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It is mainly used for deploying applications to the AWS infrastructure. On the other hand, Jenkins is an open-source automation server that is used for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. Jenkins can be deployed on-premises or on cloud platforms.

  2. Managed Service vs Self-Managed: Beanstalk is a fully managed service where most of the configuration and management tasks are abstracted away by AWS. It provides an environment and deployment infrastructure out of the box. On the contrary, Jenkins is a self-managed service. Users need to set up and maintain their Jenkins server or use cloud-based Jenkins services. This requires more effort and expertise in managing the infrastructure.

  3. Scalability and Flexibility: Beanstalk provides a scalable and flexible environment for deploying applications. It automatically handles the infrastructure scaling based on the application's needs. Jenkins, being self-managed, allows users to customize and configure the environment according to their requirements. It can be effortlessly scaled by adding additional Jenkins nodes to handle increased workload.

  4. Ease of Use and Configuration: Beanstalk is designed to be more user-friendly and easier to use for developers. It simplifies the application deployment process through its intuitive web interface and tight integration with other AWS services. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires more setup and configuration. Users need to define and configure pipelines using Jenkinsfile or declarative syntax, which requires some knowledge of scripting and CI/CD concepts.

  5. Integration with Version Control Systems: Beanstalk integrates well with popular version control systems like Git and SVN. It supports importing code directly from the repository and provides features like automatic deployments, rolling updates, and environment cloning. Jenkins also integrates with various version control systems, but it offers more flexibility in terms of triggering builds, running tests, and deploying code based on specific events or conditions defined in the CI/CD pipeline.

  6. Pricing Model: Beanstalk follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the resources consumed by the deployed applications. Users are charged for resources like EC2 instances, storage, and data transfer. Jenkins, being an open-source tool, is free to use. However, users need to bear the cost of infrastructure, whether it's on-premises or on a cloud platform, and additional plugins or services if required.

In summary, Beanstalk is a managed deployment platform provided by AWS, while Jenkins is an open-source CI/CD automation server. Beanstalk is more user-friendly and requires less management effort, whereas Jenkins provides more flexibility and control over the CI/CD pipeline configuration. Beanstalk is tightly integrated with AWS services, while Jenkins offers integration with various version control systems and customizable pipelines.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Beanstalk, Jenkins

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Beanstalk
Beanstalk
Jenkins
Jenkins

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Setup and manage repositories- Import or create Subversion and Git repositories that are instantly available to your team.;Invite team members, partners & clients- Restrict access to certain repos and provide read-only or full read/write permissions.;Browse files and changes- Every version of every file you’ve committed to Beanstalk is just a click away. See a timeline of who made changes and view the differences between revisions. Syntax highlighting for over 70 languages.;Preview, Compare & Share- Instantly preview HTML and image files in Beanstalk, compare versions side by side, and share them with your team, colleagues or clients, even if they don’t have a Beanstalk account.;Code Editing- Make and commit changes directly in the web interface of Beanstalk.;Blame Tool- View the line-by-line history of every file using Beanstalk's blame tool. Quickly see who was responsible for each line of code and which revision it belonged to.;Instantly deploy static assets from Beanstalk to your development, staging and production servers via Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files, Heroku, DreamObjects;
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
85
Stacks
59.2K
Followers
270
Followers
50.4K
Votes
51
Votes
2.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Ftp deploy
  • 9
    Deployment
  • 8
    Easy to navigate
  • 4
    Integrations
  • 4
    Code Editing
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Basecamp
Basecamp
Campfire
Campfire
FogBugz
FogBugz
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Harvest
Harvest
Zendesk
Zendesk
HipChat
HipChat
Bugify
Bugify
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Beanstalk, Jenkins?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana