Bitbucket vs Code Climate

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Code Climate

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

Bitbucket vs Code Climate: What are the differences?

Bitbucket: One place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private repositories. Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users; Code Climate: Automated Ruby Code Review. After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Bitbucket can be classified as a tool in the "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category, while Code Climate is grouped under "Code Review".

Some of the features offered by Bitbucket are:

Unlimited private repositories, charged per user
Best-in-class Jira integration
Built-in CI/CD

On the other hand, Code Climate provides the following key features:

Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.
Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.
Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider Bitbucket over the competitors, whereas "Auto sync with Github" was stated as the key factor in picking Code Climate.

According to the StackShare community, Bitbucket has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1750 company stacks & 1492 developers stacks; compared to Code Climate, which is listed in 144 company stacks and 48 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Code Climate

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Code Climate
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 740
Followers 33.4K	Followers 497
Votes 2.8K	Votes 285
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Code Climate?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Bitbucket are:

Unlimited private repositories, charged per user
Best-in-class Jira integration
Built-in CI/CD

On the other hand, Code Climate provides the following key features:

Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.
Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.
Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider Bitbucket over the competitors, whereas "Auto sync with Github" was stated as the key factor in picking Code Climate.

Bitbucket vs Code Climate