Bitbucket vs fastlane

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

fastlane

Stacks716

Followers437

Votes74

GitHub Stars40.6K

Forks6.0K

Bitbucket vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Bitbucket and fastlane, two popular tools used in software development and continuous integration processes.

Version Control System (VCS) Integration:

Bitbucket provides a built-in version control system, allowing developers to easily manage and collaborate on their code. It supports both Git and Mercurial, offering flexibility for different project requirements.
On the other hand, fastlane is not a VCS itself, but a tool that works alongside existing VCS platforms like Bitbucket. It automates various tasks related to the release cycle, such as build, testing, and deployment processes.

Platform Compatibility:

Bitbucket is a web-based platform that can be accessed from any modern web browser, providing a consistent user experience across different operating systems. It also offers native mobile apps for iOS and Android.
In contrast, fastlane is a command-line tool that can be used on various operating systems, including macOS, Linux, and Windows. It provides a command-line interface which can be integrated into existing development workflows and build systems.

Code Review and Collaboration Features:

Bitbucket offers built-in code review features, allowing developers to easily review and comment on code changes. It also supports integrations with popular collaboration tools like Jira and Trello, enabling seamless project management.
Fastlane, being a release automation tool, does not provide code review or collaboration features. Its focus is on automating the release process, ensuring the efficient and error-free deployment of applications.

Release Automation Capabilities:

One of the primary strengths of fastlane is its comprehensive release automation capabilities. It simplifies the release process by automating various tasks, such as building, testing, code signing, and deployment. It supports multiple platforms and tools, including iOS, Android, macOS, and Xcode.
While Bitbucket does provide some automation features, such as pipelines for continuous integration and deployment, it does not offer the same level of automation and flexibility as fastlane.

Community Support and Extensions:

Bitbucket has a large and active community, with a wide range of extensions, plugins, and integrations available. It provides extensive documentation and resources, making it easier for developers to find solutions and customize their workflows.
Fastlane also has an active community and supports a variety of plugins and integrations. However, its focus is more on the release automation process, so the range of available extensions may be more limited compared to Bitbucket.

Pricing and Licensing:

Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with the pricing based on the number of users and repositories. The free plan provides basic features and limited resources, while the paid plans offer more advanced functionalities and increased resource limits.
Fastlane, on the other hand, is an open-source project and is available for free. It can be used without any licensing fees, making it a cost-effective choice for automating the release process.

In summary, Bitbucket is primarily a version control system with built-in collaboration and automation features, while fastlane is a specialized release automation tool that works alongside existing VCS platforms. Bitbucket offers a comprehensive platform for code management, collaboration, and automation, whereas fastlane focuses specifically on automating the release process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, fastlane

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	fastlane
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 40.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.0K
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 716
Followers 33.4K	Followers 437
Votes 2.8K	Votes 74
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 20 Easy to use 13 Open Source 13 Itunes connect deployment 11 Incredible flexability 9 Third party integrations
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Testmunk GitHub TestFlight HockeyApp HipChat Crashlytics Travis CI Jenkins Slack Hall

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, fastlane?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Bitbucket and fastlane, two popular tools used in software development and continuous integration processes.

Version Control System (VCS) Integration:

Bitbucket provides a built-in version control system, allowing developers to easily manage and collaborate on their code. It supports both Git and Mercurial, offering flexibility for different project requirements.
On the other hand, fastlane is not a VCS itself, but a tool that works alongside existing VCS platforms like Bitbucket. It automates various tasks related to the release cycle, such as build, testing, and deployment processes.

Platform Compatibility:

Bitbucket is a web-based platform that can be accessed from any modern web browser, providing a consistent user experience across different operating systems. It also offers native mobile apps for iOS and Android.
In contrast, fastlane is a command-line tool that can be used on various operating systems, including macOS, Linux, and Windows. It provides a command-line interface which can be integrated into existing development workflows and build systems.

Code Review and Collaboration Features:

Bitbucket offers built-in code review features, allowing developers to easily review and comment on code changes. It also supports integrations with popular collaboration tools like Jira and Trello, enabling seamless project management.
Fastlane, being a release automation tool, does not provide code review or collaboration features. Its focus is on automating the release process, ensuring the efficient and error-free deployment of applications.

Release Automation Capabilities:

One of the primary strengths of fastlane is its comprehensive release automation capabilities. It simplifies the release process by automating various tasks, such as building, testing, code signing, and deployment. It supports multiple platforms and tools, including iOS, Android, macOS, and Xcode.
While Bitbucket does provide some automation features, such as pipelines for continuous integration and deployment, it does not offer the same level of automation and flexibility as fastlane.

Community Support and Extensions:

Bitbucket has a large and active community, with a wide range of extensions, plugins, and integrations available. It provides extensive documentation and resources, making it easier for developers to find solutions and customize their workflows.
Fastlane also has an active community and supports a variety of plugins and integrations. However, its focus is more on the release automation process, so the range of available extensions may be more limited compared to Bitbucket.

Pricing and Licensing:

Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with the pricing based on the number of users and repositories. The free plan provides basic features and limited resources, while the paid plans offer more advanced functionalities and increased resource limits.
Fastlane, on the other hand, is an open-source project and is available for free. It can be used without any licensing fees, making it a cost-effective choice for automating the release process.

Bitbucket vs fastlane

Overview