Bitbucket vs Fisheye

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Fisheye

Stacks40

Followers41

Votes0

Bitbucket vs Fisheye: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Bitbucket and Fisheye, which are both tools commonly used in the software development industry.

Code Hosting: Bitbucket is primarily a code hosting platform that allows users to host and share their repositories, including version control features like Git and Mercurial. On the other hand, Fisheye is a code viewer that provides a centralized place to browse and search across multiple repositories from different version control systems.
Integration with Jira: Bitbucket has a strong integration with Jira, Atlassian's issue tracking system. It provides seamless integration with Jira, allowing developers to link their code changes to Jira issues for better traceability and collaboration. Fisheye, on the other hand, does not have direct integration with Jira and requires additional plugins to achieve similar functionality.
Code Review: Bitbucket has built-in code review capabilities, providing a collaborative environment for teams to review and discuss code changes before merging them into the main branch. Fisheye, on the other hand, lacks native code review features and requires the use of additional tools or plugins to facilitate code reviews.
Supported Version Control Systems: Bitbucket supports both Git and Mercurial as version control systems, providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred system. Fisheye, on the other hand, supports a wider range of version control systems, including Git, Mercurial, Subversion, and Perforce, making it suitable for organizations that use different systems across their projects.
Repository Management: Bitbucket offers advanced repository management features, allowing users to create and manage branches, set up permissions and access controls, and define workflows specific to their projects. Fisheye, on the other hand, focuses more on code browsing and search capabilities rather than extensive repository management.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket offers free hosting for small teams and offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of users for larger teams or organizations. It also provides options for self-hosted deployments. Fisheye, on the other hand, is a commercial product that requires a paid license, making it more suitable for enterprises or organizations with specific requirements.

In summary, Bitbucket is primarily a code hosting platform with integrated code review and Jira integration, supporting Git and Mercurial as version control systems, while Fisheye is a code viewer with support for a wide range of version control systems and focuses more on code browsing and search capabilities. Bitbucket also offers more extensive repository management features and has a flexible pricing model, whereas Fisheye is a commercial product with a paid license.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Fisheye

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Fisheye
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	FishEye provides a read-only window into your Subversion, Perforce, CVS, Git, and Mercurial repositories, all in one place. Keep a pulse on everything about your code: Visualize and report on activity, integrate source with JIRA issues, and search for commits, files, revisions, or people.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Track code activity in one place;Cross-version control support;Code search;Commit graph
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 40
Followers 33.4K	Followers 41
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	SVN (Subversion) Perforce Git Mercurial Jira

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Fisheye?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Fisheye: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Bitbucket and Fisheye, which are both tools commonly used in the software development industry.

Code Hosting: Bitbucket is primarily a code hosting platform that allows users to host and share their repositories, including version control features like Git and Mercurial. On the other hand, Fisheye is a code viewer that provides a centralized place to browse and search across multiple repositories from different version control systems.
Integration with Jira: Bitbucket has a strong integration with Jira, Atlassian's issue tracking system. It provides seamless integration with Jira, allowing developers to link their code changes to Jira issues for better traceability and collaboration. Fisheye, on the other hand, does not have direct integration with Jira and requires additional plugins to achieve similar functionality.
Code Review: Bitbucket has built-in code review capabilities, providing a collaborative environment for teams to review and discuss code changes before merging them into the main branch. Fisheye, on the other hand, lacks native code review features and requires the use of additional tools or plugins to facilitate code reviews.
Supported Version Control Systems: Bitbucket supports both Git and Mercurial as version control systems, providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred system. Fisheye, on the other hand, supports a wider range of version control systems, including Git, Mercurial, Subversion, and Perforce, making it suitable for organizations that use different systems across their projects.
Repository Management: Bitbucket offers advanced repository management features, allowing users to create and manage branches, set up permissions and access controls, and define workflows specific to their projects. Fisheye, on the other hand, focuses more on code browsing and search capabilities rather than extensive repository management.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket offers free hosting for small teams and offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of users for larger teams or organizations. It also provides options for self-hosted deployments. Fisheye, on the other hand, is a commercial product that requires a paid license, making it more suitable for enterprises or organizations with specific requirements.

Bitbucket vs Fisheye

Overview

Bitbucket vs Fisheye: What are the differences?