Bitbucket vs JFrog Artifactory

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

JFrog Artifactory

Stacks343

Followers374

Votes0

Bitbucket vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Bitbucket is a Git repository management solution, while JFrog Artifactory is a universal artifact repository manager. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Integration with Version Control Systems: Bitbucket is primarily a Git repository management solution, offering support for both Git and Mercurial version control systems. On the other hand, JFrog Artifactory is not limited to Git repositories and supports various version control systems, including Git, Subversion, and more.
Artifact Management: While Bitbucket primarily focuses on version control and collaboration, JFrog Artifactory is designed specifically for artifact repository management, providing robust features for storing, managing, and distributing software artifacts.
Support for Package Types: Bitbucket predominantly supports code repositories, whereas JFrog Artifactory extends its support to various package types, including Docker images, npm packages, Maven artifacts, and more. This broader support allows JFrog Artifactory to handle a wider range of software development use cases.
Advanced Access Control: Bitbucket offers basic access control mechanisms such as permission levels (read, write, admin), but JFrog Artifactory provides more advanced access control features. With JFrog Artifactory, you can define fine-grained access policies, manage user groups, set up LDAP integration, and enforce strict security policies for artifacts.
Build Integration: Bitbucket offers limited build integration capabilities, providing features like Bamboo (Atlassian's continuous integration and delivery tool) integration. In contrast, JFrog Artifactory has built-in integration with popular build tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo, allowing seamless integration of the artifact management process with the build pipeline.
Advanced Metadata and Search Capabilities: JFrog Artifactory provides advanced metadata and search capabilities, allowing users to add custom metadata to artifacts, perform complex searches based on metadata, and utilize powerful search queries. These features are not as extensive in Bitbucket, which focuses more on source code management.

In summary, Bitbucket is primarily a Git repository management tool with basic artifact management capabilities, while JFrog Artifactory is a comprehensive artifact repository management solution that supports various package types, offers advanced access control, build integration, and powerful metadata and search capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, JFrog Artifactory

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

tutulbuet

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

GitHub

JFrog Artifactory

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for example Java SDK or any software version that has a potential vulnerability, we search the web to find out the solution and usually install a later version or patch downloading from the web. The problem is, as we are downloading it from web and there are a number of servers where we patch and as an ultimate outcome different people downloads different version and so forth. So I want to create a repository for such binaries so that we use the same patch for all servers.

When I was thinking about the repo, obviously first thought came as GitHub.. But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking is JFrog Artifactory which stores the binaries and the package software.

What is your recommendation?

258k views258k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	JFrog Artifactory
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	-
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 343
Followers 33.4K	Followers 374
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Debian npm

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, JFrog Artifactory?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Bitbucket is a Git repository management solution, while JFrog Artifactory is a universal artifact repository manager. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Integration with Version Control Systems: Bitbucket is primarily a Git repository management solution, offering support for both Git and Mercurial version control systems. On the other hand, JFrog Artifactory is not limited to Git repositories and supports various version control systems, including Git, Subversion, and more.
Artifact Management: While Bitbucket primarily focuses on version control and collaboration, JFrog Artifactory is designed specifically for artifact repository management, providing robust features for storing, managing, and distributing software artifacts.
Support for Package Types: Bitbucket predominantly supports code repositories, whereas JFrog Artifactory extends its support to various package types, including Docker images, npm packages, Maven artifacts, and more. This broader support allows JFrog Artifactory to handle a wider range of software development use cases.
Advanced Access Control: Bitbucket offers basic access control mechanisms such as permission levels (read, write, admin), but JFrog Artifactory provides more advanced access control features. With JFrog Artifactory, you can define fine-grained access policies, manage user groups, set up LDAP integration, and enforce strict security policies for artifacts.
Build Integration: Bitbucket offers limited build integration capabilities, providing features like Bamboo (Atlassian's continuous integration and delivery tool) integration. In contrast, JFrog Artifactory has built-in integration with popular build tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo, allowing seamless integration of the artifact management process with the build pipeline.
Advanced Metadata and Search Capabilities: JFrog Artifactory provides advanced metadata and search capabilities, allowing users to add custom metadata to artifacts, perform complex searches based on metadata, and utilize powerful search queries. These features are not as extensive in Bitbucket, which focuses more on source code management.

Bitbucket vs JFrog Artifactory

Overview