Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bitbucket vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?
Introduction
Bitbucket and TortoiseSVN are both version control systems that are widely used in software development projects. While they both aim to streamline and manage the code development process, they have various key differences that set them apart.
Hosting Platform: The most significant difference between Bitbucket and TortoiseSVN is the hosting platform they use. Bitbucket is a web-based hosting service, allowing developers to store their repositories online and access them through a web interface. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is not a hosting platform but a client software that integrates with Subversion (SVN) repositories, which can be hosted on various platforms.
Centralized vs Distributed: Bitbucket is based on distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git and Mercurial, meaning that each developer has a complete copy of the repository on their local machine. This allows for more flexibility, as developers can work offline and commit changes locally before synchronizing with the central repository. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is a centralized version control system (CVCS), where a central repository stores the source code, and each developer checks out and works with a working copy of the code.
Workflow: Bitbucket supports different branching models, such as feature branches and GitFlow, which enable parallel development and efficient collaboration among team members. TortoiseSVN also supports branch and merge operations but follows a more traditional branch-per-feature approach. While both systems allow for the same fundamental operations, the workflows and approaches differ, leading to distinct development practices.
Integration and Ecosystem: Bitbucket seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products such as Jira, Bamboo, and Confluence, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for issue tracking, continuous integration, and documentation. This integration enables developers to have a holistic view of the development process. TortoiseSVN has a more limited ecosystem but integrates well with Visual Studio and other IDEs commonly used in Windows-based development.
User Interface: Bitbucket offers a modern, web-based user interface that incorporates various features like pull requests, code review tools, and extensive project management capabilities. TortoiseSVN, being a client-side software, provides a Windows Explorer shell integration. It allows developers to perform version control operations directly from the context menu of files and folders in Windows Explorer.
Licensing and Cost: Bitbucket offers a range of pricing options, including a free plan for small teams, while also providing paid plans with additional features and support for larger organizations. In contrast, TortoiseSVN is an open-source tool distributed under the Apache License, making it free to use without any licensing fees.
In summary, Bitbucket differentiates itself by being a web-based hosting service, supporting distributed version control, offering advanced integration and user-friendly interfaces, and having a flexible pricing model. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is a client-side software that integrates with various hosting platforms, operates as a centralized version control system, provides Windows Explorer integration, and is free and open-source.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos905
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools349
- Unlimited private repositories342
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Source Code Insight7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Mercurial Support2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- Academic license program2
- IAM integration2
Pros of TortoiseSVN
- Easy to use2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of TortoiseSVN
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Bitbucket?
What is TortoiseSVN?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use TortoiseSVN?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with TortoiseSVN?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4
+32+34