Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

TortoiseSVN

Stacks53

Followers117

Votes3

GitHub Stars43

Forks30

Bitbucket vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bitbucket and TortoiseSVN are both version control systems that are widely used in software development projects. While they both aim to streamline and manage the code development process, they have various key differences that set them apart.

Hosting Platform: The most significant difference between Bitbucket and TortoiseSVN is the hosting platform they use. Bitbucket is a web-based hosting service, allowing developers to store their repositories online and access them through a web interface. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is not a hosting platform but a client software that integrates with Subversion (SVN) repositories, which can be hosted on various platforms.
Centralized vs Distributed: Bitbucket is based on distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git and Mercurial, meaning that each developer has a complete copy of the repository on their local machine. This allows for more flexibility, as developers can work offline and commit changes locally before synchronizing with the central repository. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is a centralized version control system (CVCS), where a central repository stores the source code, and each developer checks out and works with a working copy of the code.
Workflow: Bitbucket supports different branching models, such as feature branches and GitFlow, which enable parallel development and efficient collaboration among team members. TortoiseSVN also supports branch and merge operations but follows a more traditional branch-per-feature approach. While both systems allow for the same fundamental operations, the workflows and approaches differ, leading to distinct development practices.
Integration and Ecosystem: Bitbucket seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products such as Jira, Bamboo, and Confluence, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for issue tracking, continuous integration, and documentation. This integration enables developers to have a holistic view of the development process. TortoiseSVN has a more limited ecosystem but integrates well with Visual Studio and other IDEs commonly used in Windows-based development.
User Interface: Bitbucket offers a modern, web-based user interface that incorporates various features like pull requests, code review tools, and extensive project management capabilities. TortoiseSVN, being a client-side software, provides a Windows Explorer shell integration. It allows developers to perform version control operations directly from the context menu of files and folders in Windows Explorer.
Licensing and Cost: Bitbucket offers a range of pricing options, including a free plan for small teams, while also providing paid plans with additional features and support for larger organizations. In contrast, TortoiseSVN is an open-source tool distributed under the Apache License, making it free to use without any licensing fees.

In summary, Bitbucket differentiates itself by being a web-based hosting service, supporting distributed version control, offering advanced integration and user-friendly interfaces, and having a flexible pricing model. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is a client-side software that integrates with various hosting platforms, operates as a centralized version control system, provides Windows Explorer integration, and is free and open-source.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on Bitbucket, TortoiseSVN

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	TortoiseSVN
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Easy to use. all commands are available directly from the Windows Explorer;Powerful commit dialog. integrated spell checker for log messages;Per project settings;Integration with issue tracking systems; Helpful Tools;Available in many languages
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 43
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 30
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 53
Followers 33.4K	Followers 117
Votes 2.8K	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 3 Easy to use
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Windows Visual Studio Code

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, TortoiseSVN?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.