Bitbucket vs Visual Studio Code

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Visual Studio Code

Stacks186.5K

Followers169.1K

Votes2.3K

GitHub Stars178.2K

Forks35.9K

Bitbucket vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Bitbucket and Visual Studio Code

Bitbucket and Visual Studio Code are both popular tools used in software development, but they have key differences that set them apart. Below are six key differences between Bitbucket and Visual Studio Code:

Code Repository vs Code Editor: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service, providing the centralized storage and management of code repositories, whereas Visual Studio Code is a lightweight and versatile code editor, providing a customizable environment for writing, debugging, and compiling code.
Collaboration vs Individual Use: Bitbucket places a strong emphasis on collaboration and team-based development, providing features such as pull requests, code reviews, and inline commenting for effective team collaboration. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is primarily focused on individual use, offering powerful language support, debugging capabilities, and an extension ecosystem that allows developers to personalize their own coding experience.
Version Control System: Bitbucket supports both Git and Mercurial as version control systems, allowing developers to choose which system best suits their needs. In contrast, Visual Studio Code is not a version control system itself, but rather integrates seamlessly with various version control systems such as Git, allowing developers to use their preferred system within the code editor.
Web-Based vs Local Application: Bitbucket is a web-based tool that can be accessed through a browser, offering accessibility and convenience from anywhere with an internet connection. In contrast, Visual Studio Code is a desktop application that needs to be installed locally on the developer's machine, providing a more integrated and responsive coding environment.
Platform Compatibility: Bitbucket is a cross-platform tool that can be accessed and used on any operating system, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is also cross-platform and supports the same operating systems, providing a consistent coding experience across different devices.
Price and Licensing: Bitbucket offers a variety of pricing plans, including free options for small teams, as well as paid plans for larger organizations and advanced features. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is free and open-source software, available for everyone to use without any cost, making it an attractive option for individual developers and small teams.

In Summary, Bitbucket is a web-based code repository hosting service that focuses on collaboration and offers support for both Git and Mercurial, while Visual Studio Code is a desktop code editor that emphasizes individual use, integrates with various version control systems, and provides a customizable coding environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Visual Studio Code

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.

Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.

1.36M views1.36M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Visual Studio Code
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Combines UI of a modern editor with code assistance and navigation; Integrated debugging experience
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 178.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 35.9K
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 186.5K
Followers 33.4K	Followers 169.1K
Votes 2.8K	Votes 2.3K
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 341 Powerful multilanguage IDE 310 Fast 194 Front-end develop out of the box 158 Support TypeScript IntelliSense 142 Very basic but free Cons 46 Slow startup 29 Resource hog at times 20 Poor refactoring 14 Poor UI Designer 11 Weak Ui design tools
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Visual Studio Code?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Bitbucket and Visual Studio Code

Code Repository vs Code Editor: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service, providing the centralized storage and management of code repositories, whereas Visual Studio Code is a lightweight and versatile code editor, providing a customizable environment for writing, debugging, and compiling code.
Collaboration vs Individual Use: Bitbucket places a strong emphasis on collaboration and team-based development, providing features such as pull requests, code reviews, and inline commenting for effective team collaboration. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is primarily focused on individual use, offering powerful language support, debugging capabilities, and an extension ecosystem that allows developers to personalize their own coding experience.
Version Control System: Bitbucket supports both Git and Mercurial as version control systems, allowing developers to choose which system best suits their needs. In contrast, Visual Studio Code is not a version control system itself, but rather integrates seamlessly with various version control systems such as Git, allowing developers to use their preferred system within the code editor.
Web-Based vs Local Application: Bitbucket is a web-based tool that can be accessed through a browser, offering accessibility and convenience from anywhere with an internet connection. In contrast, Visual Studio Code is a desktop application that needs to be installed locally on the developer's machine, providing a more integrated and responsive coding environment.
Platform Compatibility: Bitbucket is a cross-platform tool that can be accessed and used on any operating system, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code is also cross-platform and supports the same operating systems, providing a consistent coding experience across different devices.
Price and Licensing: Bitbucket offers a variety of pricing plans, including free options for small teams, as well as paid plans for larger organizations and advanced features. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is free and open-source software, available for everyone to use without any cost, making it an attractive option for individual developers and small teams.

Bitbucket vs Visual Studio Code

Overview

Bitbucket vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?