StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Mobile Continuous Integration
  5. Bitrise vs Visual Studio App Center

Bitrise vs Visual Studio App Center

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitrise
Bitrise
Stacks342
Followers373
Votes74
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center
Stacks113
Followers232
Votes4

Bitrise vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Options: Bitrise offers more flexible deployment options as it supports both iOS and Android apps, allowing users to deploy their apps to multiple platforms with ease. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center focuses primarily on mobile app development and deployment, offering features specifically designed for iOS and Android apps.
  2. Integration with Third-Party Tools: Bitrise provides seamless integration with a wide range of third-party tools, such as GitHub, GitLab, and Slack, making it easier for developers to automate their workflows. In contrast, Visual Studio App Center has a more limited range of integration options, primarily focusing on Azure DevOps and GitHub.
  3. Build Environments: Bitrise offers a larger selection of build environments, including macOS, Android, and Linux, enabling developers to run their apps in a variety of different environments. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, provides only macOS build environments, limiting the options for developers who need to run their apps in different operating systems.
  4. Testing Capabilities: Bitrise offers a range of testing capabilities, including manual and automated testing, as well as integration with popular testing frameworks like XCTest and Espresso. Visual Studio App Center also provides similar testing capabilities, but it is more tightly integrated with Microsoft's testing frameworks, such as Xamarin.UITest and Appium.
  5. Monitoring and Analytics: Visual Studio App Center provides more comprehensive monitoring and analytics features, allowing developers to track app performance, crashes, and user behavior more effectively. Bitrise, on the other hand, offers basic monitoring and analytics features, but they may not be as extensive as those provided by Visual Studio App Center.
  6. Community and Support: Bitrise has a large and active community, with a wide range of documentation, tutorials, and resources available for users. Visual Studio App Center also has a supportive community, but it may not be as extensive as Bitrise's community.

In Summary, Bitrise and Visual Studio App Center have key differences in deployment options, integration with third-party tools, build environments, testing capabilities, monitoring and analytics features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bitrise
Bitrise
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Automate the lifecycle of your iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps. Connect your repo and within minutes build in the cloud, test on thousands of real devices, distribute to beta testers and app stores, and monitor real-world usage with crash and analytics data. All in one place.

Continuous Delivery;Hosted Environment;Customizable Workflows;Code Security;Open Source;Support by Devs
Build; Test; Distribute; Crashes; Diagnostics; Analytics; Push; CD/CI;
Statistics
Stacks
342
Stacks
113
Followers
373
Followers
232
Votes
74
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Bitbucket Integration
  • 8
    Advanced Workflow configuration
  • 7
    Github Integration
  • 7
    Slack integration
Pros
  • 1
    For Mobile apps diagnostics and tracking
  • 1
    Slack integration
  • 1
    Bug tracking integration
  • 1
    Show error issues for mobile devices
Integrations
Android SDK
Android SDK
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
TestFlight
TestFlight
TestFairy
TestFairy
Gradle
Gradle
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Xamarin
Xamarin
Slack
Slack
Parse
Parse
Twilio
Twilio
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Bitrise, Visual Studio App Center?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot