StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. Knowledge Management
  5. BlueSpice vs MediaWiki

BlueSpice vs MediaWiki

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MediaWiki
MediaWiki
Stacks178
Followers88
Votes0
BlueSpice
BlueSpice
Stacks1
Followers7
Votes0

BlueSpice vs MediaWiki: What are the differences?

Introduction

BlueSpice and MediaWiki are both wiki platforms used for creating and managing content on websites. While they share similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart. In this analysis, we will discuss six specific differences between BlueSpice and MediaWiki.

  1. Interface and User Experience: BlueSpice provides a more user-friendly interface with a simplified and intuitive user experience. It offers enhanced usability features such as a customizable dashboard, visual editor, and drag-and-drop functionality. On the other hand, MediaWiki has a more basic interface with a steeper learning curve, aimed at more technical users and developers.

  2. Extensions and Functionality: BlueSpice offers a wide range of pre-installed extensions and functionalities tailored towards enterprise requirements, such as task management, quality management, and social media integration. These extensions are seamlessly integrated into the platform. In contrast, MediaWiki has a vast collection of open-source extensions that allow for extensive customization but require manual installation and configuration.

  3. Access Control and Permissions: BlueSpice provides advanced access control and permission management capabilities. It allows for granular control over user rights, enabling administrators to set specific permissions for different user groups or individual users. MediaWiki, on the other hand, has a more basic access control system that is primarily based on user group permissions.

  4. Technical Support and Documentation: BlueSpice offers comprehensive technical support, including professional services and customer support. They provide detailed documentation, user manuals, and video tutorials to assist users in utilizing the platform effectively. In contrast, MediaWiki primarily relies on its community for support, with less comprehensive official documentation and paid support options.

  5. Semantic Capabilities: BlueSpice incorporates semantic capabilities into its platform, allowing users to structure and categorize content using semantic annotations. This enables advanced features such as semantic searching, data integration, and the creation of semantic forms. MediaWiki, while having some support for semantic technologies through extensions, does not have built-in semantic capabilities.

  6. Compatibility and Upgradability: BlueSpice is designed as a MediaWiki distribution, built on top of the MediaWiki core. This means that it is fully compatible with MediaWiki's database schema and extensions, allowing for seamless integration and upgradability. However, BlueSpice may require additional steps or considerations during upgrades due to the modifications made to the core software. MediaWiki, being the core platform, offers a more straightforward upgrade process and maintains compatibility with third-party extensions.

In summary, BlueSpice offers a more user-friendly interface, pre-installed enterprise-oriented extensions, advanced access control, comprehensive technical support, semantic capabilities, and compatibility with MediaWiki, while MediaWiki provides a more basic interface, extensive customization options through community-developed extensions, a simpler access control system, primarily community-driven support, and comparatively straightforward upgradability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MediaWiki, BlueSpice

Michael
Michael

Software Engineer

May 20, 2020

Needs adviceonConfluenceConfluenceGoogle DocsGoogle Docs

Hello community, I am looking for a self-hosted online document management solution. One that covers all my needs is Confluence but it is currently not affordable for my team. Key requirements are RTL support, WYSIWYG Editing (Word-like interface as much as possible), Concurrent Editing (the best experience I have with Google Docs where I can even see who else is currently editing a document) with conflict resolution, versioning (view history and switch between versions), PDF and Word export, complex tables, and some others, full list here in column "A". I found XWIKI covering all my requirements (including those "bonus features" that I didn't list here) except one - RTL. Here a hack is suggested to address this issues but I would prefer not to go with any hacks. I myself am ready to contribute to an open source development but other people who (hopefully) will use this tool are not software engineers and this fact must be kept in mind... Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!

62k views62k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MediaWiki
MediaWiki
BlueSpice
BlueSpice

It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.

It is an open source web application to secure and organize your company knowledge. With our software you can realize your integrated management system, documentation system, organization manual, intranet wiki and a flexible knowledge base.

-
Secure; Knowledge base; Based on MediaWiki
Statistics
Stacks
178
Stacks
1
Followers
88
Followers
7
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to MediaWiki, BlueSpice?

Slite

Slite

Slite is the easiest way for teams to write together. From meeting notes, handbooks, guides, specifications to anything your team needs written down and retrievable in just a few clicks.

SpacePrompts

SpacePrompts

Never lose your best AI prompts again. SpacePrompts provides seamless prompt management to help you save, organize, and access your ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other AI assistant prompts instantly across all your devices.

ProProfs Knowledge Base

ProProfs Knowledge Base

It is a powerful online knowledge management software that empowers HRs, trainers and top management of a company to manage employee and organizational knowledge. With support for over 90+ languages, it allows businesses to easily retain and share knowledge with employees by uploading company documents and files to a central location. HRs can easily share company policies and procedures with new hires and quickly orient them to the company’s culture via a private intra-company knowledgebase. Trainers can also use the knolwedgebase to share articles, videos and know-hows with employees to facilitate training.

PromptX

PromptX

PromptX is an AI-powered enterprise knowledge and workflow platform that helps organizations search, discover and act on information with speed and accuracy. It unifies data from SharePoint, Google Drive, email, cloud systems and legacy databases into one secure Enterprise Knowledge System. Using generative and agentic AI, users can ask natural language questions and receive context-rich, verifiable answers in seconds. PromptX ingests and enriches content with semantic tagging, entity recognition and knowledge cards, turning unstructured data into actionable insights. With adaptive prompts, collaborative workspaces and AI-driven workflows, teams make faster, data-backed decisions. The platform includes RBAC, SSO, audit trails and compliance-ready AI governance, and integrates with any LLM or external search engine. It supports cloud, hybrid and on-premise deployments for healthcare, public sector, finance and enterprise service providers. PromptX converts disconnected data into trusted and actionable intelligence, bringing search, collaboration and automation into a single unified experience.

Moterra

Moterra

Transforms enterprise knowledge into action. Secure, compliant AI assistants built for legal, finance, and operations teams.

Obsidian

Obsidian

It is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.

Roam Research

Roam Research

It is a note-taking tool for networked thought. As easy to use as a document. As powerful as a graph database. It helps you organize your research for the long haul.

Feedly

Feedly

With Feedly, you can organize in one place industry publications, expert blogs, news sites, youtube channels, twitter feeds and much more.Keep up with the topics and trends you care about, without the overwhelm.

Logseq

Logseq

It is a platform for knowledge sharing and management. It focuses on privacy, longevity, and user control. The server will never store or analyze your private notes. Your data are plain text files.

Joplin

Joplin

It is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, can be copied, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor. The notes are in Markdown format.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack