Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BrowserStack vs Experitest: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare the key differences between BrowserStack and Experitest, two popular web and mobile testing platforms.
Deployment flexibility: BrowserStack offers a cloud-based platform that allows users to access a wide range of browsers and devices for testing purposes. On the other hand, Experitest provides both cloud-based and on-premise options, giving users the flexibility to choose the deployment method that best meets their needs.
Supported platforms: BrowserStack offers a comprehensive set of platforms including desktop browsers, mobile emulators, and real devices for both Android and iOS. Experitest, however, focuses more on mobile testing and offers support for a wide range of real devices and emulators for Android and iOS.
Testing capabilities: While both platforms offer essential testing capabilities such as compatibility testing and automation testing, BrowserStack provides additional features like responsive testing, visual testing, and network simulation. Experitest, on the other hand, focuses on providing advanced mobile testing features such as device performance monitoring and mobile analytics.
Integration with CI/CD pipelines: BrowserStack has seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, enabling developers to easily incorporate testing into their continuous integration and deployment workflows. Experitest also provides integration capabilities but has a more limited range of CI/CD tool integrations available.
Collaboration and team management: BrowserStack offers collaboration features such as shared testing sessions, annotations, and bug reporting that make it easier for teams to work together on testing tasks. Experitest also provides collaboration features but with a heavier focus on test management and reporting rather than real-time collaboration.
Pricing and licensing models: BrowserStack offers a variety of pricing plans based on different usage levels, allowing users to choose the one that best fits their requirements. Experitest, on the other hand, follows a more traditional licensing model and offers different editions with varying features and capabilities.
In summary, BrowserStack and Experitest differ in terms of deployment flexibility, supported platforms, testing capabilities, integration with CI/CD pipelines, collaboration features, and pricing/licensing models. Depending on specific needs and requirements, users can choose between these platforms to enhance their web and mobile testing processes.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers135
- Ease of use76
- Real browsers65
- Ability to use it locally44
- Good price27
- Great web interface21
- IE support19
- Official mobile emulators17
- Cloud-based access15
- Instant access15
- Real mobile devices12
- Multiple Desktop OS8
- Selenium compatible8
- Screenshots8
- Can be used for Testing and E2E7
- Pre-installed developer tools6
- Video of test runs5
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing4
- Favourites4
- Webdriver compatible4
- Many browsers4
- Test Management3
- Test automation dashboard3
- Cypress Compatible3
- Bi-directional Jira Sync3
- Free for Open Source3
- Unify and track test cases3
- Cross-browser testing3
- Speed is fast2
- Real devices2
- Private devices1
- Test WCAG Compliance1
- Web accessibility1
- Visual testing and review1
Pros of Experitest
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2



