StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Ghost Inspector

BrowserStack vs Ghost Inspector

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Stacks64
Followers117
Votes22

BrowserStack vs Ghost Inspector: What are the differences?

# Introduction
BrowserStack and Ghost Inspector are both powerful tools used for automated testing and cross-browser testing in web development.

1. **Testing Capabilities**: BrowserStack allows for performing testing on a wide range of real devices and browsers, enabling testers to check how their website functions across different platforms. On the other hand, Ghost Inspector focuses primarily on automated visual regression testing, ensuring that the visual elements of a website remain consistent across different builds and deployments.

2. **Integration Options**: BrowserStack offers extensive integration capabilities with popular tools like Jira, Jenkins, and GitHub, allowing for seamless incorporation of testing into the development workflow. Ghost Inspector integrates well with Slack and Zapier, streamlining the communication of test results and automating various tasks based on test outcomes.

3. **Collaboration Features**: BrowserStack provides collaborative testing features, such as live testing, screen sharing, and bug tracking, making it easier for teams to work together on identifying and resolving issues. Ghost Inspector offers collaborative test creation and editing, allowing multiple team members to contribute to test suites and scenarios.

4. **Automation Flexibility**: BrowserStack supports both manual and automated testing, giving users the flexibility to choose the most appropriate method based on the testing requirements. In contrast, Ghost Inspector focuses solely on automated testing, emphasizing efficiency and repeatability in the testing process.

5. **Reporting and Analytics**: BrowserStack offers detailed reporting and analytics capabilities, providing insights into test coverage, pass/fail ratios, and performance metrics. Ghost Inspector also provides comprehensive test result reports, highlighting visual changes and discrepancies detected during the testing process.

6. **Customization Options**: BrowserStack provides advanced customization options for testing environments, allowing users to simulate specific network conditions and device configurations. Ghost Inspector offers customization for testing schedules and notifications, enabling users to set up automated test runs at specific intervals and receive alerts based on predefined conditions.

In Summary, BrowserStack excels in its diverse testing capabilities and extensive integrations, while Ghost Inspector specializes in automated visual regression testing and collaborative test creation. Both tools offer unique features that cater to different aspects of the testing process in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
64
Followers
2.0K
Followers
117
Votes
533
Votes
22
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
Pros
  • 3
    Simple test editor
  • 3
    No code required
  • 3
    Runscope integration
  • 2
    Screenshot comparison
  • 2
    Videos of every test run
Cons
  • 1
    Support Cross-device testing (device, web)
  • 0
    Flash Support inside browser
  • 0
    Load & Performance testing
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Runscope
Runscope
GitHub
GitHub
Heroku
Heroku
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Ghost Inspector?

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana