Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BrowserStack vs Litmus: What are the differences?
Comparison of BrowserStack and Litmus
Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between BrowserStack and Litmus, two popular tools used for browser and email testing.
BrowserStack: BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that allows developers and testers to test their web applications on different browsers and operating systems. It provides a wide range of browsers and devices for testing purposes.
Litmus: Litmus is an email testing and analytics tool that helps email marketers and designers to ensure the compatibility and performance of their email campaigns across different email clients, devices, and operating systems.
Pricing Model: BrowserStack operates on a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed monthly or annual fee to access the platform and its features. On the other hand, Litmus offers both subscription-based plans and pay-as-you-go options, allowing users to choose the most suitable pricing model for their needs.
Focus Area: While BrowserStack is primarily focused on browser testing, Litmus specializes in email testing and optimization. BrowserStack provides extensive browser and device coverage, allowing users to test their web applications on different browsers and operating systems. Litmus, on the other hand, provides a wide range of tools and features specifically designed for email testing and optimization.
Integration Capabilities: BrowserStack offers seamless integration with popular testing frameworks and development tools, such as Selenium, Jenkins, and Jira. This integration capability allows developers to incorporate browser testing into their existing development and testing workflows. In contrast, Litmus provides integrations with popular email marketing platforms like MailChimp and Campaign Monitor, enabling users to directly test and optimize their email campaigns within these platforms.
Testing Scope: The scope of testing is another significant difference between BrowserStack and Litmus. BrowserStack focuses on testing web applications across multiple browsers and platforms, allowing users to identify cross-browser compatibility issues. In contrast, Litmus focuses on testing email campaigns and ensures their compatibility across various email clients, devices, and operating systems. This includes rendering, functionality, and responsiveness of the email content.
In summary, BrowserStack is a cross-browser testing tool that specializes in testing web applications across different browsers and operating systems. Litmus, on the other hand, is an email testing and optimization tool that focuses on ensuring the compatibility and performance of email campaigns across various email clients, devices, and operating systems.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers134
- Ease of use75
- Real browsers64
- Ability to use it locally43
- Good price26
- Great web interface20
- IE support18
- Official mobile emulators16
- Instant access14
- Cloud-based access14
- Real mobile devices11
- Multiple Desktop OS7
- Selenium compatible7
- Screenshots7
- Can be used for Testing and E2E6
- Pre-installed developer tools5
- Video of test runs4
- Many browsers3
- Favourites3
- Webdriver compatible3
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing3
- Free for Open Source2
- Unify and track test cases2
- Test automation dashboard2
- Test Management2
- Cross-browser testing2
- Cypress Compatible2
- Bi-directional Jira Sync2
- Speed is fast1
- Real devices1
- Visual testing and review0
- Test WCAG Compliance0
- Web accessibility0
Pros of Litmus
- Support for tons of email clients13
- Works fast5
- Great free trial offer4
- Review what the user sees4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2