Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BrowserStack vs Testrail: What are the differences?
Introduction
BrowserStack and Testrail are two popular tools used in software testing. While both of them serve the purpose of improving software quality, there are key differences between them. In this article, we will explore six specific differences between BrowserStack and Testrail.
1. Pricing Model: BrowserStack offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of parallel test sessions and the duration of the sessions. On the other hand, Testrail follows a user-based pricing model, where the cost is determined by the number of users who require access to the tool.
2. Functionality: BrowserStack primarily focuses on cross-browser and device testing, providing a wide range of real devices and browsers for testing purposes. It also offers additional features like automated screenshot comparisons and responsive testing. Testrail, on the other hand, is a comprehensive test management tool that allows users to plan, track, and manage their software testing efforts. It includes features like test case management, test run management, and test reporting.
3. Integrations: BrowserStack offers integrations with popular testing frameworks and automation tools like Selenium and Appium. It also provides integration with popular project management tools like JIRA and Trello. Testrail, on the other hand, offers integrations with various bug tracking tools, version control systems, and automation frameworks.
4. Accessibility Testing: BrowserStack includes a range of accessibility testing features, allowing users to test their web applications for accessibility compliance. It provides support for screen readers, color contrast, and keyboard navigation testing. Testrail, on the other hand, does not offer specific accessibility testing features.
5. Test Execution: BrowserStack allows users to execute tests on real devices and browsers hosted in the BrowserStack cloud. This ensures accurate and realistic testing results. Testrail, on the other hand, does not provide an execution environment for tests. It focuses on test management and reporting.
6. Collaboration Features: Testrail offers extensive collaboration features, allowing users to assign roles and permissions to different team members. It also provides features like comments, discussions, and notifications to facilitate collaboration among team members. BrowserStack, on the other hand, does not have as robust collaboration features as Testrail.
In summary, BrowserStack primarily focuses on cross-browser and device testing with real devices and browsers, while Testrail is a comprehensive test management tool. BrowserStack offers a parallel test session-based pricing model, while Testrail follows a user-based pricing model. BrowserStack provides extensive integrations with testing frameworks and project management tools, while Testrail offers integrations with bug tracking tools, version control systems, and automation frameworks. BrowserStack includes accessibility testing features, while Testrail does not. BrowserStack allows test execution on real devices and browsers, while Testrail focuses on test management. Testrail offers extensive collaboration features, while BrowserStack does not have as robust collaboration features.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers135
- Ease of use76
- Real browsers65
- Ability to use it locally44
- Good price27
- Great web interface21
- IE support19
- Official mobile emulators17
- Cloud-based access15
- Instant access15
- Real mobile devices12
- Multiple Desktop OS8
- Selenium compatible8
- Screenshots8
- Can be used for Testing and E2E7
- Pre-installed developer tools6
- Video of test runs5
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing4
- Favourites4
- Webdriver compatible4
- Many browsers4
- Test Management3
- Test automation dashboard3
- Cypress Compatible3
- Bi-directional Jira Sync3
- Free for Open Source3
- Unify and track test cases3
- Cross-browser testing3
- Speed is fast2
- Real devices2
- Private devices1
- Test WCAG Compliance1
- Web accessibility1
- Visual testing and review1
Pros of Testrail
- Designed for testers10
- Easy to use6
- Intutive5
- Easy Intergration5
- Customer Support3
- Integration to jira1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2
Cons of Testrail
- Pricey4