StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Testrail

BrowserStack vs Testrail

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
Testrail
Testrail
Stacks218
Followers265
Votes30

BrowserStack vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Introduction

BrowserStack and Testrail are two popular tools used in software testing. While both of them serve the purpose of improving software quality, there are key differences between them. In this article, we will explore six specific differences between BrowserStack and Testrail.

1. Pricing Model: BrowserStack offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of parallel test sessions and the duration of the sessions. On the other hand, Testrail follows a user-based pricing model, where the cost is determined by the number of users who require access to the tool.

2. Functionality: BrowserStack primarily focuses on cross-browser and device testing, providing a wide range of real devices and browsers for testing purposes. It also offers additional features like automated screenshot comparisons and responsive testing. Testrail, on the other hand, is a comprehensive test management tool that allows users to plan, track, and manage their software testing efforts. It includes features like test case management, test run management, and test reporting.

3. Integrations: BrowserStack offers integrations with popular testing frameworks and automation tools like Selenium and Appium. It also provides integration with popular project management tools like JIRA and Trello. Testrail, on the other hand, offers integrations with various bug tracking tools, version control systems, and automation frameworks.

4. Accessibility Testing: BrowserStack includes a range of accessibility testing features, allowing users to test their web applications for accessibility compliance. It provides support for screen readers, color contrast, and keyboard navigation testing. Testrail, on the other hand, does not offer specific accessibility testing features.

5. Test Execution: BrowserStack allows users to execute tests on real devices and browsers hosted in the BrowserStack cloud. This ensures accurate and realistic testing results. Testrail, on the other hand, does not provide an execution environment for tests. It focuses on test management and reporting.

6. Collaboration Features: Testrail offers extensive collaboration features, allowing users to assign roles and permissions to different team members. It also provides features like comments, discussions, and notifications to facilitate collaboration among team members. BrowserStack, on the other hand, does not have as robust collaboration features as Testrail.

In summary, BrowserStack primarily focuses on cross-browser and device testing with real devices and browsers, while Testrail is a comprehensive test management tool. BrowserStack offers a parallel test session-based pricing model, while Testrail follows a user-based pricing model. BrowserStack provides extensive integrations with testing frameworks and project management tools, while Testrail offers integrations with bug tracking tools, version control systems, and automation frameworks. BrowserStack includes accessibility testing features, while Testrail does not. BrowserStack allows test execution on real devices and browsers, while Testrail focuses on test management. Testrail offers extensive collaboration features, while BrowserStack does not have as robust collaboration features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, Testrail

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Testrail
Testrail

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Efficiently manage test cases, plans and runs;Boost testing productivity significantly;Get real-time insights into your testing progress;Integrates with your issue tracker & test automation
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
218
Followers
2.0K
Followers
265
Votes
533
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
Pros
  • 10
    Designed for testers
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    Intutive
  • 5
    Easy Intergration
  • 3
    Customer Support
Cons
  • 4
    Pricey
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Jira
Jira
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Mantis
Mantis
Redmine
Redmine
Gemini
Gemini
Bugzilla
Bugzilla

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Testrail?

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana