Buddy vs Codecov

Overview

Codecov

Stacks2.8K

Followers325

Votes102

Buddy

Stacks293

Followers348

Votes606

Buddy vs Codecov: What are the differences?

Buddy: Build, test and deploy on push in seconds. Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment; Codecov: Hosted coverage reports with awesome features to enhance your CI workflow. Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

Buddy and Codecov are primarily classified as "Continuous Deployment" and "Code Coverage" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Buddy are:

Automatic deployments on push to branch
Docker-based builds and tests
10-minute setup of complete environment

On the other hand, Codecov provides the following key features:

Beautiful Reports
Pull Request Comments
Interactive Commit Graphs

"Docker" is the primary reason why developers consider Buddy over the competitors, whereas "More stable than coveralls" was stated as the key factor in picking Codecov.

According to the StackShare community, Codecov has a broader approval, being mentioned in 49 company stacks & 29 developers stacks; compared to Buddy, which is listed in 20 company stacks and 13 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Codecov, Buddy

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codecov	Buddy
Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.	Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.
Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration	Automatic deployments on push to branch;Docker-based builds and tests;10-minute setup of complete environment;Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket & GitLab;DevOps and website monitoring actions;Clear and telling UI/UX;Supports all popular languages and frameworks, including PHP/Laravel, Node.js, Rails, Python, Java, .NET Core, Elixir and Go
Statistics
Stacks 2.8K	Stacks 293
Followers 325	Followers 348
Votes 102	Votes 606
Pros & Cons
Pros 17 More stable than coveralls 17 Easy setup 14 GitHub integration 11 They reply their users 10 Easy setup,great ui Cons 1 GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight 0 Delayed results by hours since recent outage 0 Support does not respond to email	Pros 56 Easy setup 53 Docker 50 Continuous Integration 49 Integrations 46 Beautiful dashboard Cons 1 Deleted account after 1 month of not pushing code
Integrations
HipChat Jenkins Bitbucket GitLab GitHub CircleCI Heroku	Jekyll Grunt Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Hexo Amazon EC2 Meteor Slack .NET Ruby

What are some alternatives to Codecov, Buddy?

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Coveralls

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Google Cloud Build

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

Buildstash

Software build artifact and release management. For mobile and desktop apps, games, XR, or embedded - never lose a binary again, steer through QA and sign-off, and distribute to users.

Efficient and consistent CI/CD with Kubernetes

A solution for implementing efficient and consistent delivery of containerized software to Kubernetes facilitating best practices. It respects existing industry standards (Dockerfiles and Helm charts) and glues existing Cloud Native tools.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Buddy are:

Automatic deployments on push to branch
Docker-based builds and tests
10-minute setup of complete environment

On the other hand, Codecov provides the following key features:

Beautiful Reports
Pull Request Comments
Interactive Commit Graphs

"Docker" is the primary reason why developers consider Buddy over the competitors, whereas "More stable than coveralls" was stated as the key factor in picking Codecov.

Buddy vs Codecov