StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. Buddy vs DeployBot

Buddy vs DeployBot

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DeployBot
DeployBot
Stacks90
Followers92
Votes74
Buddy
Buddy
Stacks293
Followers348
Votes606

Buddy vs DeployBot: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Deployment Methods: Buddy offers a wide range of deployment methods including FTP/SFTP, SSH, Cloud Services (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud), Docker, and more. On the other hand, DeployBot primarily focuses on Git-based deployments, making it a more suitable choice for developers who heavily rely on version control systems.

  2. Automation Level: Buddy provides powerful automation features such as pipelines, which allow users to automate complex workflows with ease. DeployBot also offers automation capabilities but may not be as versatile as Buddy in terms of creating intricate automated processes.

  3. Collaboration Tools: Buddy offers features like user roles, access permissions, and code reviews to facilitate seamless collaboration among team members. While DeployBot also supports collaboration through integrations with platforms like Slack, it may lack some of the finer-grained control options that Buddy provides.

  4. Monitoring and Notifications: Buddy provides real-time monitoring of deployments and detailed notifications to keep users informed about the status of their projects. DeployBot also offers notifications but may not have the same level of monitoring capabilities as Buddy.

  5. Integrations: Buddy offers a large number of integrations with popular tools such as GitHub, Bitbucket, Slack, and Jira, enhancing the overall workflow efficiency. DeployBot, while supporting integrations with services like GitHub and Slack, may not have the same extensive list of integrations as Buddy.

  6. Cost Structure: The pricing models of Buddy and DeployBot differ significantly. Buddy offers a more flexible pricing structure based on the number of actions performed, while DeployBot's pricing is primarily based on the number of active repositories, making it crucial for users to consider their specific needs when choosing between the two platforms.

In Summary, Buddy and DeployBot differ in deployment methods, automation level, collaboration tools, monitoring capabilities, integrations, and cost structures, catered to different user preferences and requirements. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DeployBot
DeployBot
Buddy
Buddy

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Manually deploy with a click in the app, automatically deploy on each push, or use deploy tags in a commit [deploy:production].;DeployBot gathers new and changed files from your repositories since the last deployment. You can even preview the changes first.;Files are uploaded, SSH commands are executed and deployment hooks are triggered. Everything is logged for you.;Your entire team can view release notes and optionally receive an email notification with details about the deployment status.;Environments overview;Deployments timeline;Deployment details: tickets, revisions & files
Automatic deployments on push to branch;Docker-based builds and tests;10-minute setup of complete environment;Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket & GitLab;DevOps and website monitoring actions;Clear and telling UI/UX;Supports all popular languages and frameworks, including PHP/Laravel, Node.js, Rails, Python, Java, .NET Core, Elixir and Go
Statistics
Stacks
90
Stacks
293
Followers
92
Followers
348
Votes
74
Votes
606
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Easy setup
  • 20
    Seamless integrations
  • 17
    Free
  • 10
    Rocks
  • 1
    Docker
Cons
  • 1
    Not reliable
Pros
  • 56
    Easy setup
  • 53
    Docker
  • 50
    Continuous Integration
  • 49
    Integrations
  • 46
    Beautiful dashboard
Cons
  • 1
    Deleted account after 1 month of not pushing code
Integrations
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Jekyll
Jekyll
Grunt
Grunt
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Hexo
Hexo
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Meteor
Meteor
Slack
Slack
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to DeployBot, Buddy?

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

AWS CodePipeline

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Spinnaker

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Harness.io

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Google Cloud Build

Google Cloud Build

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

Kraken Deploy

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

DeployHQ

DeployHQ

A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.

Gaia

Gaia

Gaia is an open source automation platform which makes it easy and fun to build powerful pipelines in any programming language. Based on HashiCorp's go-plugin and gRPC, gaia is efficient, fast, lightweight, and developer friendly.

Weaveworks Flux

Weaveworks Flux

It is the operator that makes GitOps happen in your cluster. It ensures that the cluster config matches the one in git and automates your deployments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana