Buddy vs Docker

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Buddy

Stacks293

Followers348

Votes606

Buddy vs Docker: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Deployment Method: Buddy is a continuous integration and delivery tool that automates the deployment process, including building, testing, and deploying code to various environments. In contrast, Docker is a platform that allows developers to containerize applications, making them portable and scalable across different environments. While Buddy focuses on streamlining the deployment pipeline, Docker focuses on containerization of applications.
Scope of Functionality: Buddy offers a complete CI/CD solution with features like automated testing, code review, and integrations with popular services, while Docker primarily focuses on containerization and isolation of applications. This means Buddy provides a comprehensive toolset for the entire software development lifecycle, while Docker's primary function is to create and manage containers.
Dependency Management: Buddy allows users to define dependencies and automate the installation of required packages and dependencies during the deployment process. On the other hand, Docker uses container images that encapsulate all dependencies and libraries needed to run an application, providing a consistent environment across different systems without the need to manage dependencies manually.
Resource Utilization: Buddy optimizes resource utilization by allowing users to define resource limits for each deployment pipeline, ensuring efficient use of computing resources. In contrast, Docker uses containerization to isolate applications and resources, allowing for better resource utilization by running multiple containers on the same host without interference.
Scalability: Buddy offers scalability through the use of deployment pipelines that can be easily scaled up or down based on project requirements, allowing for parallel execution of tasks. Docker provides scalability through the use of container orchestration tools like Kubernetes, which can manage and scale containers across multiple hosts automatically.
Community Support: Buddy has a user-friendly interface and offers extensive documentation and customer support to assist users in setting up and using the platform effectively. Docker, being an open-source platform, has a vast community of developers and contributors who provide support, updates, and resources for troubleshooting and optimizing containerized applications.

In Summary, Buddy focuses on automating the deployment process and streamlining the CI/CD pipeline, while Docker primarily deals with containerization of applications, offering portability and scalability across different environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Buddy

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Buddy
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Automatic deployments on push to branch;Docker-based builds and tests;10-minute setup of complete environment;Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket & GitLab;DevOps and website monitoring actions;Clear and telling UI/UX;Supports all popular languages and frameworks, including PHP/Laravel, Node.js, Rails, Python, Java, .NET Core, Elixir and Go
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 293
Followers 143.8K	Followers 348
Votes 3.9K	Votes 606
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	Pros 56 Easy setup 53 Docker 50 Continuous Integration 49 Integrations 46 Beautiful dashboard Cons 1 Deleted account after 1 month of not pushing code
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	Jekyll Grunt Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Hexo Amazon EC2 Meteor Slack .NET Ruby

What are some alternatives to Docker, Buddy?

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Google Cloud Build

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

Related Comparisons

Buddy vs Docker: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Deployment Method: Buddy is a continuous integration and delivery tool that automates the deployment process, including building, testing, and deploying code to various environments. In contrast, Docker is a platform that allows developers to containerize applications, making them portable and scalable across different environments. While Buddy focuses on streamlining the deployment pipeline, Docker focuses on containerization of applications.
Scope of Functionality: Buddy offers a complete CI/CD solution with features like automated testing, code review, and integrations with popular services, while Docker primarily focuses on containerization and isolation of applications. This means Buddy provides a comprehensive toolset for the entire software development lifecycle, while Docker's primary function is to create and manage containers.
Dependency Management: Buddy allows users to define dependencies and automate the installation of required packages and dependencies during the deployment process. On the other hand, Docker uses container images that encapsulate all dependencies and libraries needed to run an application, providing a consistent environment across different systems without the need to manage dependencies manually.
Resource Utilization: Buddy optimizes resource utilization by allowing users to define resource limits for each deployment pipeline, ensuring efficient use of computing resources. In contrast, Docker uses containerization to isolate applications and resources, allowing for better resource utilization by running multiple containers on the same host without interference.
Scalability: Buddy offers scalability through the use of deployment pipelines that can be easily scaled up or down based on project requirements, allowing for parallel execution of tasks. Docker provides scalability through the use of container orchestration tools like Kubernetes, which can manage and scale containers across multiple hosts automatically.
Community Support: Buddy has a user-friendly interface and offers extensive documentation and customer support to assist users in setting up and using the platform effectively. Docker, being an open-source platform, has a vast community of developers and contributors who provide support, updates, and resources for troubleshooting and optimizing containerized applications.

Buddy vs Docker

Overview