StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Buddy vs Reviewable

Buddy vs Reviewable

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Reviewable
Reviewable
Stacks17
Followers32
Votes23
Buddy
Buddy
Stacks293
Followers348
Votes606

Buddy vs Reviewable: What are the differences?

Developers describe Buddy as "Build, test and deploy on push in seconds". Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment. On the other hand, Reviewable is detailed as "GitHub code reviews done right". A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Buddy and Reviewable are primarily classified as "Continuous Deployment" and "Code Review" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Buddy are:

  • Automatic deployments on push to branch
  • Docker-based builds and tests
  • 10-minute setup of complete environment

On the other hand, Reviewable provides the following key features:

  • See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).
  • Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.
  • Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.

"Docker" is the top reason why over 49 developers like Buddy, while over 4 developers mention "Batch commenting" as the leading cause for choosing Reviewable.

According to the StackShare community, Buddy has a broader approval, being mentioned in 29 company stacks & 103 developers stacks; compared to Reviewable, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 8 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Reviewable
Reviewable
Buddy
Buddy

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).;Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.;Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.;Tracks reviewed files, unreplied / unresolved comments.;Comments map across code changes, never disappear.;Send all comments in one batch, or one at a time.;Open files on the right line directly in your editor.
Automatic deployments on push to branch;Docker-based builds and tests;10-minute setup of complete environment;Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket & GitLab;DevOps and website monitoring actions;Clear and telling UI/UX;Supports all popular languages and frameworks, including PHP/Laravel, Node.js, Rails, Python, Java, .NET Core, Elixir and Go
Statistics
Stacks
17
Stacks
293
Followers
32
Followers
348
Votes
23
Votes
606
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Batch commenting
  • 4
    Makes me feel organised and in control
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Efficient comment paging
  • 3
    Easy incremental reviewing
Pros
  • 56
    Easy setup
  • 53
    Docker
  • 50
    Continuous Integration
  • 49
    Integrations
  • 46
    Beautiful dashboard
Cons
  • 1
    Deleted account after 1 month of not pushing code
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Jekyll
Jekyll
Grunt
Grunt
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Hexo
Hexo
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Meteor
Meteor
Slack
Slack
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Reviewable, Buddy?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana