Buildbot vs Octopus Deploy

Overview

Octopus Deploy

Stacks407

Followers493

Votes118

Buildbot

Stacks73

Followers128

Votes27

GitHub Stars5.4K

Forks1.7K

Buildbot vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

# Introduction 

Key differences between Buildbot and Octopus Deploy:

1. **Architecture**: Buildbot follows a master-slave architecture where a central master coordinates builds across multiple slaves. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is designed as a centralized deployment tool with a client-server architecture. 
2. **Supported Technologies**: Buildbot is more oriented towards continuous integration and supports a wide range of programming languages, build systems, and version control systems. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, focuses on deployment automation and is specifically tailored for .NET, Java, and other enterprise applications.
3. **Deployment Pipeline**: Buildbot provides a customizable build pipeline for continuous integration, allowing users to define custom workflows and build steps. Octopus Deploy, however, offers a clear deployment pipeline with release management capabilities, simplifying the process of deploying applications to various environments.
4. **Integration**: Buildbot offers extensive integration with various tools and platforms through plugins and extensions, allowing users to customize their CI/CD workflows. Octopus Deploy provides native integrations with popular developer tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Azure DevOps, enhancing the deployment automation process.
5. **User Interface**: Buildbot primarily focuses on providing a web-based interface for managing builds and viewing build results. Octopus Deploy offers a user-friendly web interface with intuitive dashboards and deployment tracking features, simplifying the management of deployment pipelines.
6. **Licensing Model**: Buildbot is an open-source tool released under the GPLv2 license, allowing users to modify and distribute the software freely. Octopus Deploy follows a commercial licensing model with various pricing tiers based on the number of deployment targets or instances used.

In Summary, the key differences between Buildbot and Octopus Deploy lie in their architecture, supported technologies, deployment pipelines, integration capabilities, user interfaces, and licensing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Octopus Deploy, Buildbot

Sri Srinivas

Feb 11, 2020

Needs advice

I want to start automatic regressions for nightly builds and also continuous integration builds. The tests I ran are part of my regression suite. And I want to track the results of these tests.

I am able to do this with Jenkins using the Junit plugin. But, I am trying to do the same with Buildbot, and I am not able to get the report of the tests. So, I just want to know is it possible to get the reporting of tests through Buildbot. If yes, could anyone provide some examples

121k views121k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Octopus Deploy	Buildbot
Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.	BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes. By automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other developers are inconvenienced by the failure.
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams	run builds on a variety of slave platforms;arbitrary build process: handles projects using C, Python, whatever;minimal host requirements: Python and Twisted;slaves can be behind a firewall if they can still do checkout;status delivery through web page, email, IRC, other protocols;track builds in progress, provide estimated completion time;flexible configuration by subclassing generic build process classes;debug tools to force a new build, submit fake Changes, query slave status;released under the GPL
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.7K
Stacks 407	Stacks 73
Followers 493	Followers 128
Votes 118	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 30 Powerful 25 Simplicity 20 Easy to learn 17 .Net oriented 14 Easy to manage releases and rollback Cons 4 Poor UI 2 Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git) 2 Management of Config	Pros 9 Highly configurable builds 5 Beautiful waterfall 5 Hosted internally 4 Free open source 3 Python
Integrations
Jenkins Azure DevOps TeamCity Jira Appveyor Bamboo	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Octopus Deploy, Buildbot?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Buildbot vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

# Introduction 

Key differences between Buildbot and Octopus Deploy:

1. **Architecture**: Buildbot follows a master-slave architecture where a central master coordinates builds across multiple slaves. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is designed as a centralized deployment tool with a client-server architecture. 
2. **Supported Technologies**: Buildbot is more oriented towards continuous integration and supports a wide range of programming languages, build systems, and version control systems. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, focuses on deployment automation and is specifically tailored for .NET, Java, and other enterprise applications.
3. **Deployment Pipeline**: Buildbot provides a customizable build pipeline for continuous integration, allowing users to define custom workflows and build steps. Octopus Deploy, however, offers a clear deployment pipeline with release management capabilities, simplifying the process of deploying applications to various environments.
4. **Integration**: Buildbot offers extensive integration with various tools and platforms through plugins and extensions, allowing users to customize their CI/CD workflows. Octopus Deploy provides native integrations with popular developer tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Azure DevOps, enhancing the deployment automation process.
5. **User Interface**: Buildbot primarily focuses on providing a web-based interface for managing builds and viewing build results. Octopus Deploy offers a user-friendly web interface with intuitive dashboards and deployment tracking features, simplifying the management of deployment pipelines.
6. **Licensing Model**: Buildbot is an open-source tool released under the GPLv2 license, allowing users to modify and distribute the software freely. Octopus Deploy follows a commercial licensing model with various pricing tiers based on the number of deployment targets or instances used.

Buildbot vs Octopus Deploy

Overview