Buildkite vs Jenkins

Overview

Buildkite

Stacks210

Followers231

Votes115

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Buildkite vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Buildkite and Jenkins are both popular continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools used to automate software development and delivery processes. While they serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

Ecosystem and Plugin Availability: Buildkite provides an extensive collection of first-party plugins that cover the majority of CI/CD use cases. However, Jenkins offers a much larger ecosystem of third-party plugins, giving users a wider range of options and flexibility in customizing their CI/CD pipelines.
Ease of Use and Configuration: Buildkite focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a user-friendly interface and intuitive configuration process. On the other hand, Jenkins has a steeper learning curve and can be more complex to configure, requiring users to have a deeper understanding of its underlying architecture.
Scalability and Performance: Buildkite is known for its scalability and ability to handle large-scale CI/CD pipelines. It allows users to easily distribute agents across multiple machines, optimizing resource utilization and improving overall performance. Jenkins, while scalable, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve similar levels of scalability.
Hosted vs Self-Hosted: Buildkite primarily operates as a hosted service, providing a cloud-based solution that takes care of infrastructure management and maintenance. Jenkins, on the other hand, is typically self-hosted, allowing users to have full control over their CI/CD infrastructure but also requiring them to handle the setup, maintenance, and scaling of servers.
Built-in Features: Buildkite offers a more streamlined and focused approach to CI/CD, providing essential features out of the box, such as parallelism, artifact management, and pipeline insights. Jenkins, being highly extensible, requires users to install and configure additional plugins to access similar functionalities.
Community Support: Jenkins has a vast and active community of users and contributors, making it easier to find support, documentation, and resources. Buildkite, while growing in popularity, has a smaller community in comparison, which may result in limited community-driven support options.

In Summary, Buildkite and Jenkins differ in terms of plugin availability, ease of use, scalability, hosting options, built-in features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Buildkite, Jenkins

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Pedro Gil

Head of Engineering at lengoo GmbH

May 4, 2021

Decided

We replaced Jenkins with Github Actions for all our repositories hosted on Github. GA has two significant benefits for us compared to an external build tool: it's simpler, and it sits at eye level.

Its simplicity and smooth user experience makes it easier for all developers to adopt, giving them more autonomy.

Sitting at eye level means it's completely run and configured right alongside the code, so that it's easier to observe and adjust our builds as we go.

These two benefits have made "the build" less of a system engineer responsibility and more of a developer tool, giving developers more ownership from code to release.

77.7k views77.7k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Buildkite	Jenkins
CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.	In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Fast and stable builds; Open source agent runs on almost any machine and architecture; Freedom to use your own internal or pre-release tools and services; Powerful distributed build tools; Key/value targeting of agents; Dynamic job allocation allows adding and removing build machines; Shared key/value and binary artifact stores for easily distributing build jobs regardless of machine or network; Integration with pull requests, deployments and releases; GitHub, Github Enterprise, Bitbucket, Gitlab or your own SCM; Slack, Hipchat, Webhooks, and LIFX notifications; Extensible per-project with agent hooks, webhooks and the rest API; GitHub Enterprise is supported standard; SSO	Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 24.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 9.2K
Stacks 210	Stacks 59.2K
Followers 231	Followers 50.4K
Votes 115	Votes 2.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 18 Great customer support 17 Github integration 16 Easy to use 16 Easy setup 12 Simplicity	Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Lack of support 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Integrations
Slack GitHub Docker GitLab Heroku HipChat Bitbucket Git GitHub Enterprise TestFlight	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Buildkite, Jenkins?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Related Comparisons

Buildkite vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ecosystem and Plugin Availability: Buildkite provides an extensive collection of first-party plugins that cover the majority of CI/CD use cases. However, Jenkins offers a much larger ecosystem of third-party plugins, giving users a wider range of options and flexibility in customizing their CI/CD pipelines.
Ease of Use and Configuration: Buildkite focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a user-friendly interface and intuitive configuration process. On the other hand, Jenkins has a steeper learning curve and can be more complex to configure, requiring users to have a deeper understanding of its underlying architecture.
Scalability and Performance: Buildkite is known for its scalability and ability to handle large-scale CI/CD pipelines. It allows users to easily distribute agents across multiple machines, optimizing resource utilization and improving overall performance. Jenkins, while scalable, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve similar levels of scalability.
Hosted vs Self-Hosted: Buildkite primarily operates as a hosted service, providing a cloud-based solution that takes care of infrastructure management and maintenance. Jenkins, on the other hand, is typically self-hosted, allowing users to have full control over their CI/CD infrastructure but also requiring them to handle the setup, maintenance, and scaling of servers.
Built-in Features: Buildkite offers a more streamlined and focused approach to CI/CD, providing essential features out of the box, such as parallelism, artifact management, and pipeline insights. Jenkins, being highly extensible, requires users to install and configure additional plugins to access similar functionalities.
Community Support: Jenkins has a vast and active community of users and contributors, making it easier to find support, documentation, and resources. Buildkite, while growing in popularity, has a smaller community in comparison, which may result in limited community-driven support options.

In Summary, Buildkite and Jenkins differ in terms of plugin availability, ease of use, scalability, hosting options, built-in features, and community support.

Buildkite vs Jenkins

Overview