Overview

Filestack

Stacks86

Followers114

Votes4

CameraTag

Stacks6

Followers13

Votes0

CameraTag vs Filestack: What are the differences?

Introduction: CameraTag and Filestack are both popular services that offer solutions for handling media uploads on websites.

Integration with Existing Platforms: CameraTag offers seamless integration with various platforms such as WordPress, Shopify, and Wix, making it easy for users to incorporate the service into their existing websites. On the other hand, Filestack provides a wide range of SDKs and APIs, allowing for customization and integration with different platforms and programming languages.
File Handling Capabilities: CameraTag primarily focuses on providing tools for capturing and uploading images and videos, with features like filters and effects. In contrast, Filestack offers a comprehensive suite of tools for handling not only images and videos but also documents, audio files, and other types of media.
Storage Options: CameraTag includes cloud storage as part of its service, allowing users to store their media files securely. Filestack, on the other hand, offers integrations with various cloud storage providers such as Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage, giving users more flexibility in choosing where to store their files.
Customization and Branding: CameraTag provides limited options for customization and branding, with pre-designed templates and themes. In comparison, Filestack offers extensive customization capabilities, allowing users to tailor the look and feel of the media upload experience to match their brand's identity.
Security Features: CameraTag focuses on providing secure media uploading capabilities, including encryption and secure connections. Filestack also prioritizes security by offering features like file virus scanning and access control, ensuring that uploaded media remains protected from unauthorized access.
Pricing Model: CameraTag operates on a subscription-based pricing model, with different plans based on the volume of media uploads. Filestack, on the other hand, offers a pay-as-you-go pricing structure, where users only pay for the services they use without being tied to a specific plan.

In Summary, CameraTag and Filestack differ in terms of their platform integrations, file handling capabilities, storage options, customization features, security measures, and pricing structures.

Detailed Comparison

Filestack	CameraTag
Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet.	With one line of code you can easily start collecting videos for applications ranging from video-comments to talent competitions, political action, virtual interviews, talent scouting and more.<br>
Connect your app to everything from Dropbox to Gmail in just 2 lines of code and let Filepicker.io handle the mess of uploading files - we give you a clean, short URL that is easy to store and read from.;Your files are stored in your existing S3 bucket. We handle all the complicated javascript and backend APIs to give you a clean and elegant way of saving files directly to your S3 bucket.;To make it even easier to work with user content, we enable image post-processing. This way, regardless of what type of file a user uploads from the Cloud or their local device, you can be sure it's in exactly the right size. To convert an image, take the filepicker url and append /convert, along with query parameters specifying what you want to change.;Pick Widget (supports Box, Computer, Dropbox, Evernote, Facebook, Flickr, FTP, GitHub, Google Drive, Skydrive, Picasa, Gmail, Instagram);Drag-Drop Widget;Export Widget;Drag-Drop Pane;Custom Logo and CSS;Multiple Administrators;Insights and Analytics;99.9% Uptime;Email and Phone Support	HD Webcam Recording;Desktop Uploads;Record By Phone;Record On-The-Go (via mobile web browser);100% Customizable Interface;99.99% SLA;REST API;JS API<br>
Statistics
Stacks 86	Stacks 6
Followers 114	Followers 13
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 All the sources I need Cons 1 Slow support	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Evernote Facebook OneDrive Box GitHub Google Drive Amazon CloudFront Dropbox	Heroku

What are some alternatives to Filestack, CameraTag?

Uploadcare

Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content.

Transloadit

Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents.

Bytescale

Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.

Uppy

Uppy is a sleek modular file uploader for web browsers. Add it to your app with one line of code, or build a custom version with just the plugins you need via Webpack/Browserify. 100% open source, backed by a company (Transloadit).

CarrierWave

This gem provides a simple and extremely flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. It works well with Rack based web applications, such as Ruby on Rails.

Paperclip

It is intended as an easy file attachment library for ActiveRecord. The intent behind it was to keep setup as easy as possible and to treat files as much like other attributes as possible.

Shrine

Shrine implements a plugin system analogous to Roda’s and Sequel’s. Shrine ships with over 25 plugins, which together provide a great arsenal of features. Where CarrierWave and other file upload libraries favor complex class-level DSLs, Shrine favours simple instance-level interface.

tus.io

Open protocol for resumable file uploads

FilePond

A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience.

Flatfile

The drop-in data importer that implements in hours, not weeks. Give your users the import experience you always dreamed of, but never had time to build.