Alternatives to Filestack logo

Alternatives to Filestack

Cloudinary, Uploadcare, Google Drive, CloudFlare, and Dropbox are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Filestack.
85
114
+ 1
4

What is Filestack and what are its top alternatives?

Filestack is a cloud-based file handling service that allows developers to easily upload, store, transform, and deliver files. It offers features such as file uploading through a simple API, automatic transcoding of videos and images, cloud storage integration, and delivery optimization. However, some limitations of Filestack include pricing based on usage, limited customization options, and potential security concerns.

  1. Cloudinary: Cloudinary is a powerful media management solution that offers features like image and video upload, transformation, optimization, and delivery. Pros include advanced image manipulation capabilities and generous free tier, while cons include pricing based on usage and complexity for beginners.
  2. Uploadcare: Uploadcare provides file uploading and content delivery solutions with features like automatic file handling, image transformations, and CDN integration. Pros include real-time image editing capabilities and content delivery optimization, while cons include limited video processing options.
  3. Imgix: Imgix is an image processing and delivery service that offers on-the-fly image manipulation, optimization, and CDN integration. Pros include high-quality image transformations and fast delivery speeds, while cons include pricing based on usage and lack of file uploading capabilities.
  4. Tus.io: Tus.io is an open-source protocol for resumable file uploads that enables efficient handling of large files. Pros include support for resumable uploads and flexibility for customization, while cons include self-hosting requirements and potential implementation complexities.
  5. Transloadit: Transloadit is a file uploading and processing service that offers features like encoding, decoding, and file manipulation. Pros include versatile file processing capabilities and pay-as-you-go pricing, while cons include limited free tier options and potential integration challenges.
  6. MediaStack: MediaStack is a media processing API that offers features like image and video processing, storage, and delivery. Pros include comprehensive media processing capabilities and affordable pricing plans, while cons include lack of advanced customization options.
  7. Uppy: Uppy is a customizable file uploader that supports features like resumable uploads, drag-and-drop functionality, and integrations with various cloud services. Pros include flexibility for customization and easy integration with existing systems, while cons include potential complexity for beginners.
  8. Dotmesh: Dotmesh is a data management platform that offers features like versioning, replication, and sharing of datasets. Pros include robust data management capabilities and collaborative workflow support, while cons include potential scalability limitations and learning curve.
  9. Minio: Minio is an open-source object storage solution that provides features like S3 compatibility, high performance, and scalability. Pros include self-hosted deployment options and easy integration with existing systems, while cons include potential management complexities and lack of advanced data processing capabilities.
  10. Lob: Lob is an API platform for mailing and address verification services that offers features like address cleansing, real-time printing, and postcard delivery. Pros include reliable mailing services and easy API integration, while cons include pricing based on usage and limited customization options.

Top Alternatives to Filestack

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • Uploadcare
    Uploadcare

    Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • MaxCDN
    MaxCDN

    The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them. ...

Filestack alternatives & related posts

Cloudinary logo

Cloudinary

600
179
An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
600
179
PROS OF CLOUDINARY
  • 37
    Easy setup
  • 31
    Fast image delivery
  • 26
    Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
  • 21
    Free tier
  • 11
    Heroku add-on
  • 9
    Reduce development costs
  • 7
    Amazing support
  • 6
    Heroku plugin
  • 6
    Great libraries for all languages
  • 6
    Virtually limitless scale
  • 5
    Easy to integrate with Rails
  • 4
    Cheap
  • 3
    Shot setup time
  • 3
    Very easy setup
  • 2
    Solves alot of image problems.
  • 1
    Best in the market and includes free plan
  • 1
    Extremely generous free pricing tier
  • 0
    Fast image delivery, vast array
CONS OF CLOUDINARY
  • 5
    Paid plan is expensive

related Cloudinary posts

Uploadcare logo

Uploadcare

73
27
File uploads, media processing, and adaptive delivery for web and mobile
73
27
PROS OF UPLOADCARE
  • 10
    Great team
  • 6
    Simple image upload with widget
  • 5
    Easy to integrate into any website
  • 5
    Awesome support
  • 1
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
CONS OF UPLOADCARE
  • 1
    Upload widget is large (114KB)
  • 0
    no cons

related Uploadcare posts

Google Drive logo

Google Drive

82.6K
2.1K
A safe place for all your files
82.6K
2.1K
PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
  • 505
    Easy to use
  • 326
    Gmail integration
  • 312
    Enough free space
  • 268
    Collaboration
  • 249
    Stable service
  • 128
    Desktop and mobile apps
  • 97
    Offline sync
  • 79
    Apps
  • 74
    15 gb storage
  • 50
    Add-ons
  • 9
    Integrates well
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Simple back-up tool
  • 2
    Amazing
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 2
    Fast upload speeds
  • 2
    The more the merrier
  • 2
    So easy
  • 2
    Wonderful
  • 2
    Linux terminal transfer tools
  • 2
    It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
  • 1
    UI
  • 1
    Windows desktop
  • 1
    G Suite integration
CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
  • 7
    Organization via web ui sucks
  • 2
    Not a real database

related Google Drive posts

Tom Klein

Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

See more
Shared insights
on
Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

See more
CloudFlare logo

CloudFlare

76.8K
1.8K
The Web Performance & Security Company.
76.8K
1.8K
PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 426
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 278
    Free ssl
  • 200
    Easy setup
  • 191
    Security
  • 181
    Ssl
  • 98
    Great cdn
  • 77
    Optimizer
  • 71
    Simple
  • 44
    Great UI
  • 28
    Great js cdn
  • 12
    AutoMinify
  • 12
    HTTP/2 Support
  • 12
    Apps
  • 12
    DNS Analytics
  • 9
    Ipv6
  • 9
    Rocket Loader
  • 9
    Easy
  • 8
    Fantastic CDN service
  • 8
    IPv6 "One Click"
  • 7
    DNSSEC
  • 7
    Free GeoIP
  • 7
    Amazing performance
  • 7
    API
  • 7
    Cheapest SSL
  • 7
    Nice DNS
  • 7
    SSHFP
  • 6
    SPDY
  • 6
    Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
  • 5
    Asynchronous resource loading
  • 5
    Ubuntu
  • 4
    Global Load Balancing
  • 4
    Easy Use
  • 4
    Performance
  • 3
    CDN
  • 2
    Support for SSHFP records
  • 2
    Registrar
  • 1
    Web3
  • 1
    Прохси
  • 1
    HTTPS3/Quic
CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 2
    No support for SSHFP records
  • 2
    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

related CloudFlare posts

Tom Klein

Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

See more
Johnny Bell

When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

See more
Dropbox logo

Dropbox

23.4K
1.7K
Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
23.4K
1.7K
PROS OF DROPBOX
  • 434
    Easy to work with
  • 256
    Free
  • 216
    Popular
  • 176
    Shared file hosting
  • 167
    'just works'
  • 100
    No brainer
  • 79
    Integration with external services
  • 76
    Simple
  • 49
    Good api
  • 38
    Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
  • 11
    It just works
  • 8
    Convenient
  • 7
    Accessible from all of my devices
  • 5
    Command Line client
  • 4
    Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
  • 4
    Can even be used by your grandma
  • 3
    Reliable
  • 3
    Sync API
  • 3
    Mac app
  • 3
    Cross platform app
  • 2
    Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
  • 2
    Delta synchronization
  • 2
    Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
  • 2
    Backups, local and cloud
  • 2
    Extended version history
  • 2
    Beautiful UI
  • 1
    YC Company
  • 1
    What a beautiful app
  • 1
    Easy/no setup
  • 1
    So easy
  • 1
    The more the merrier
  • 1
    Easy to work with
  • 1
    For when client needs file without opening firewall
  • 1
    Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Official Linux app
  • 0
    The more the merrier
CONS OF DROPBOX
  • 3
    Personal vs company account is confusing
  • 1
    Replication kills CPU and battery

related Dropbox posts

Shared insights
on
Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

See more
Shared insights
on
BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

See more
Amazon CloudFront logo

Amazon CloudFront

21.4K
935
Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
21.4K
935
PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
  • 245
    Fast
  • 166
    Cdn
  • 157
    Compatible with other aws services
  • 125
    Simple
  • 108
    Global
  • 41
    Cheap
  • 36
    Cost-effective
  • 27
    Reliable
  • 19
    One stop solution
  • 9
    Elastic
  • 1
    Object store
  • 1
    HTTP/2 Support
CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
  • 3
    UI could use some work
  • 1
    Invalidations take so long

related Amazon CloudFront posts

Russel Werner
Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.9M views

StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

#StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

See more
Julien DeFrance
Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

Future improvements / technology decisions included:

Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

See more
Akamai logo

Akamai

1.9K
0
The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
1.9K
0
PROS OF AKAMAI
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Akamai posts

      MaxCDN logo

      MaxCDN

      1.6K
      100
      Our CDN makes your site load faster!
      1.6K
      100
      PROS OF MAXCDN
      • 47
        Easy setup
      • 33
        Speed to my clients
      • 15
        Great service & Customer Support
      • 5
        Shared and Affordable SSL
      CONS OF MAXCDN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related MaxCDN posts

        Justin Dorfman
        Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 250.6K views

        When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

        What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

        For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

        • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
        • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
        • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

        Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

        See more
        Todd Gardner

        We migrated the hosting of our CDN, which is used to serve the JavaScript Error collection agent, from Amazon CloudFront to MaxCDN. During our test, we found MaxCDN to be more reliable and less expensive for serving he file.

        The reports and controls were also considerably better.

        See more