Alternatives to Uploadcare logo

Alternatives to Uploadcare

Filestack, Cloudinary, imgix, Transloadit, and Google Drive are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Uploadcare.
73
122
+ 1
27

What is Uploadcare and what are its top alternatives?

Uploadcare is a versatile file handling and CDN service that allows users to upload, transform, optimize, and deliver media files to their websites or applications. Its key features include automatic image resizing, lazy loading, file storage, and smart delivery. However, one limitation is that it may be costly for high levels of usage.

  1. Cloudinary: Cloudinary is a comprehensive media management platform that offers features such as image and video manipulation, storage, and delivery. It is known for its powerful APIs and integrations with various platforms. Pros: Wide range of features, extensive documentation. Cons: May be complex for beginners.
  2. Imgix: Imgix is an image processing service that provides real-time image optimization and delivery. It offers features like on-the-fly resizing, cropping, and compression. Pros: Fast image delivery, easy setup. Cons: Limited free plan.
  3. Sirv: Sirv is a dynamic imaging service that allows users to optimize, resize, and deliver images in real-time. It offers features like lazy loading, instant zoom, and image SEO. Pros: High-speed image processing, easy integration. Cons: Limited storage capacity.
  4. Filestack: Filestack is a file handling service that enables users to upload, transform, and deliver files easily. It offers features like file conversion, metadata extraction, and secure storage. Pros: Simple to use, extensive file format support. Cons: Limited free plan.
  5. ImageKit: ImageKit is an image optimization and delivery service that provides features like automatic format conversion, lazy loading, and intelligent cropping. Pros: Fast global CDN, developer-friendly APIs. Cons: Some features may require additional configuration.
  6. Flamelink: Flamelink is a headless CMS with media management capabilities that support image and video uploads, optimization, and delivery. It is designed for seamless integration with Firebase projects. Pros: Firebase integration, user-friendly interface. Cons: Limited support for non-Firebase projects.
  7. Fastly Image Optimizer: Fastly Image Optimizer is a real-time image transformation service that offers features like responsive design support, lazy loading, and automatic format conversion. Pros: Fast image optimization, flexible configurations. Cons: May require some learning curve.
  8. Kraken.io: Kraken.io is an image optimization API that helps users to compress and resize images without losing quality. It offers features like API integration, bulk processing, and cloud storage support. Pros: High compression rates, easy to use. Cons: Limited free plan.
  9. Plyr: Plyr is a media player library that supports video and audio files with customizable controls and HTML5 compatibility. It offers features like full-screen mode, captions support, and responsive design. Pros: Lightweight, customizable player. Cons: Limited video streaming options.
  10. Cognitio Image CDN: Cognitio Image CDN is an image delivery service that uses AI-powered optimization techniques to enhance image quality and load times. It offers features like automatic format conversion, adaptive quality control, and real-time image enhancement. Pros: AI-driven optimization, seamless integration. Cons: May not support all image formats.

Top Alternatives to Uploadcare

  • Filestack
    Filestack

    Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet. ...

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • imgix
    imgix

    imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters. ...

  • Transloadit
    Transloadit

    Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

Uploadcare alternatives & related posts

Filestack logo

Filestack

85
4
Easy, Powerful File Uploads
85
4
PROS OF FILESTACK
  • 4
    All the sources I need
CONS OF FILESTACK
  • 1
    Slow support

related Filestack posts

Cloudinary logo

Cloudinary

601
179
An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
601
179
PROS OF CLOUDINARY
  • 37
    Easy setup
  • 31
    Fast image delivery
  • 26
    Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
  • 21
    Free tier
  • 11
    Heroku add-on
  • 9
    Reduce development costs
  • 7
    Amazing support
  • 6
    Heroku plugin
  • 6
    Great libraries for all languages
  • 6
    Virtually limitless scale
  • 5
    Easy to integrate with Rails
  • 4
    Cheap
  • 3
    Shot setup time
  • 3
    Very easy setup
  • 2
    Solves alot of image problems.
  • 1
    Best in the market and includes free plan
  • 1
    Extremely generous free pricing tier
  • 0
    Fast image delivery, vast array
CONS OF CLOUDINARY
  • 5
    Paid plan is expensive

related Cloudinary posts

imgix logo

imgix

218
177
Optimize, manage, and deliver images and videos for faster pages, better visual quality, and a simpler workflow.
218
177
PROS OF IMGIX
  • 28
    Image processing on demand
  • 24
    Easy setup
  • 18
    Smart Cropping
  • 18
    Reduce Development Costs
  • 15
    Efficient
  • 12
    Insanely Fast
  • 11
    Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
  • 10
    Easy to understand pricing
  • 9
    Professional Features and Options
  • 6
    Excellent Face Detection
  • 6
    Lightyears better than ImageMagick
  • 5
    S3 as source
  • 4
    Great for Dynamic Compositing
  • 4
    Scales to your company's needs
  • 1
    Free tier
  • 1
    Amazing support
  • 1
    Great libraries and integrations
  • 1
    Automatic scrset generation
  • 1
    Forward thinking
  • 1
    Video encoding
  • 1
    Fast Image Delivery
CONS OF IMGIX
    Be the first to leave a con

    related imgix posts

    Mountain/ \Ash

    Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

    See more
    Mountain/ \Ash

    In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

    See more
    Transloadit logo

    Transloadit

    37
    26
    The world's most versatile file uploading & encoding service for developers
    37
    26
    PROS OF TRANSLOADIT
    • 9
      Easy setup
    • 6
      Highly customizable
    • 5
      Incredible customer support
    • 4
      So simple and powerful
    • 2
      Easy integration with most languages
    CONS OF TRANSLOADIT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Transloadit posts

      Google Drive logo

      Google Drive

      82.8K
      2.1K
      A safe place for all your files
      82.8K
      2.1K
      PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
      • 505
        Easy to use
      • 326
        Gmail integration
      • 312
        Enough free space
      • 268
        Collaboration
      • 249
        Stable service
      • 128
        Desktop and mobile apps
      • 97
        Offline sync
      • 79
        Apps
      • 74
        15 gb storage
      • 50
        Add-ons
      • 9
        Integrates well
      • 6
        Easy to use
      • 3
        Simple back-up tool
      • 2
        Amazing
      • 2
        Beautiful
      • 2
        Fast upload speeds
      • 2
        The more the merrier
      • 2
        So easy
      • 2
        Wonderful
      • 2
        Linux terminal transfer tools
      • 2
        It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
      • 1
        UI
      • 1
        Windows desktop
      • 1
        G Suite integration
      CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
      • 7
        Organization via web ui sucks
      • 2
        Not a real database

      related Google Drive posts

      Tom Klein

      Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

      I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

      Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

      See more
      CloudFlare logo

      CloudFlare

      76.9K
      1.8K
      The Web Performance & Security Company.
      76.9K
      1.8K
      PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 426
        Easy setup, great cdn
      • 278
        Free ssl
      • 200
        Easy setup
      • 191
        Security
      • 181
        Ssl
      • 98
        Great cdn
      • 77
        Optimizer
      • 71
        Simple
      • 44
        Great UI
      • 28
        Great js cdn
      • 12
        AutoMinify
      • 12
        HTTP/2 Support
      • 12
        Apps
      • 12
        DNS Analytics
      • 9
        Ipv6
      • 9
        Rocket Loader
      • 9
        Easy
      • 8
        Fantastic CDN service
      • 8
        IPv6 "One Click"
      • 7
        DNSSEC
      • 7
        Free GeoIP
      • 7
        Amazing performance
      • 7
        API
      • 7
        Cheapest SSL
      • 7
        Nice DNS
      • 7
        SSHFP
      • 6
        SPDY
      • 6
        Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
      • 5
        Asynchronous resource loading
      • 5
        Ubuntu
      • 4
        Global Load Balancing
      • 4
        Easy Use
      • 4
        Performance
      • 3
        CDN
      • 2
        Support for SSHFP records
      • 2
        Registrar
      • 1
        Web3
      • 1
        Прохси
      • 1
        HTTPS3/Quic
      CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 2
        No support for SSHFP records
      • 2
        Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

      related CloudFlare posts

      Tom Klein

      Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

      See more
      Johnny Bell

      When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

      One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

      Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

      When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

      I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

      See more
      Dropbox logo

      Dropbox

      23.4K
      1.7K
      Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
      23.4K
      1.7K
      PROS OF DROPBOX
      • 434
        Easy to work with
      • 256
        Free
      • 216
        Popular
      • 176
        Shared file hosting
      • 167
        'just works'
      • 100
        No brainer
      • 79
        Integration with external services
      • 76
        Simple
      • 49
        Good api
      • 38
        Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
      • 11
        It just works
      • 8
        Convenient
      • 7
        Accessible from all of my devices
      • 5
        Command Line client
      • 4
        Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
      • 4
        Can even be used by your grandma
      • 3
        Reliable
      • 3
        Sync API
      • 3
        Mac app
      • 3
        Cross platform app
      • 2
        Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
      • 2
        Delta synchronization
      • 2
        Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
      • 2
        Backups, local and cloud
      • 2
        Extended version history
      • 2
        Beautiful UI
      • 1
        YC Company
      • 1
        What a beautiful app
      • 1
        Easy/no setup
      • 1
        So easy
      • 1
        The more the merrier
      • 1
        Easy to work with
      • 1
        For when client needs file without opening firewall
      • 1
        Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
      • 1
        Easy to use
      • 1
        Official Linux app
      • 0
        The more the merrier
      CONS OF DROPBOX
      • 3
        Personal vs company account is confusing
      • 1
        Replication kills CPU and battery

      related Dropbox posts

      Shared insights
      on
      Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

      I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

      Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

      Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

      See more
      Amazon CloudFront logo

      Amazon CloudFront

      21.4K
      935
      Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
      21.4K
      935
      PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
      • 245
        Fast
      • 166
        Cdn
      • 157
        Compatible with other aws services
      • 125
        Simple
      • 108
        Global
      • 41
        Cheap
      • 36
        Cost-effective
      • 27
        Reliable
      • 19
        One stop solution
      • 9
        Elastic
      • 1
        Object store
      • 1
        HTTP/2 Support
      CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
      • 3
        UI could use some work
      • 1
        Invalidations take so long

      related Amazon CloudFront posts

      Russel Werner
      Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.9M views

      StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

      Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

      #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

      See more
      Julien DeFrance
      Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

      Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

      I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

      For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

      Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

      Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

      Future improvements / technology decisions included:

      Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

      As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

      One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

      See more