StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Campfire vs Zoho Cliq

Campfire vs Zoho Cliq

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Campfire
Campfire
Stacks19
Followers21
Votes8
Zoho Cliq
Zoho Cliq
Stacks22
Followers29
Votes0

Campfire vs Zoho Cliq: What are the differences?

Introduction

Campfire and Zoho Cliq are two popular team communication and collaboration tools that offer unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between the two can help organizations make an informed decision when choosing a tool that best fits their needs.

  1. Customization Options: Campfire provides users with extensive customization options, allowing them to personalize the interface, themes, and notification settings according to their preferences. On the other hand, Zoho Cliq offers limited customization options, focusing more on providing a streamlined user experience with predefined settings.

  2. Integration Capabilities: Zoho Cliq offers seamless integration with other popular productivity tools such as Zoho CRM, Zoho Projects, and third-party applications through its marketplace. In contrast, Campfire has fewer integration options, primarily focusing on integrating with Basecamp, its parent company's project management tool.

  3. Collaboration Tools: Zoho Cliq offers a wide array of collaboration tools, including polls, reminders, notes, and task management features, enabling teams to collaborate efficiently within the platform. Campfire, while also providing collaboration features, is more focused on real-time messaging and file sharing, with fewer advanced collaboration tools compared to Zoho Cliq.

  4. Accessibility and Mobility: Zoho Cliq offers mobile applications for both iOS and Android platforms, ensuring users can access the platform on the go and stay connected with their team members. Campfire, on the other hand, lacks dedicated mobile applications, limiting its accessibility and mobile functionality compared to Zoho Cliq.

  5. Security Features: Zoho Cliq prioritizes security by offering end-to-end encryption for messages, ensuring that sensitive information shared within the platform remains secure and protected. Campfire, while providing standard security measures, does not offer end-to-end encryption, potentially making it less secure for confidential communications.

  6. User Interface Design: Zoho Cliq boasts a modern and intuitive user interface design, making it easy for users to navigate the platform and utilize its features effectively. Campfire, while functional, has a more simplistic user interface design that may lack the aesthetic appeal and user experience optimization seen in Zoho Cliq.

In Summary, Campfire stands out for its customization options and integration capabilities, while Zoho Cliq excels in collaboration tools, security features, and modern user interface design.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Campfire, Zoho Cliq

Stefan
Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Campfire
Campfire
Zoho Cliq
Zoho Cliq

Campfire is like instant messaging, but designed exclusively for groups. Share text, files, and code in real time. Save transcripts so you don’t forget.

It is a business communication app that includes real-time messaging, task management and automation. You can share files and make audio or video calls, right from within your chat channels. it is loaded with features to keep teams productive and cohesive.

-
Collaboration; Video Broadcasting for Teams; Work Remotely
Statistics
Stacks
19
Stacks
22
Followers
21
Followers
29
Votes
8
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Minimalist
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Integrations with CI servers etc
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Zendesk
Zendesk
Wufoo
Wufoo
BugHerd
BugHerd
UserVoice
UserVoice
Hipmob
Hipmob
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Honeybadger
Honeybadger
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
New Relic
New Relic
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Campfire, Zoho Cliq?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack