StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Casbin vs Xkit

Casbin vs Xkit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Casbin
Casbin
Stacks39
Followers78
Votes0
GitHub Stars19.4K
Forks1.7K
Xkit
Xkit
Stacks3
Followers12
Votes0

Casbin vs Xkit: What are the differences?

# Introduction

This Markdown provides key differences between Casbin and Xkit.

1. **Implementation Language**: Casbin is implemented in Golang, while Xkit is implemented in TypeScript, making the former suitable for applications written in Go and the latter for applications written in JavaScript environments.
2. **License**: Casbin is licensed under Apache 2.0, allowing for more permissive use, modification, and distribution, whereas Xkit is under a commercial license, which may involve licensing fees for certain use cases.
3. **Focus**: Casbin primarily focuses on access control and permission management, providing functionalities like RBAC, ABAC, and PBAC, whereas Xkit is an automation platform that helps organizations streamline workflow automation and integration processes.
4. **Community Support**: Casbin has a larger open-source community contributing to its development, providing more resources, documentation, and support, while Xkit, being more commercially oriented, may offer dedicated support but to a narrower user base.
5. **Deployment**: Both Casbin and Xkit can be deployed in various environments, but Casbin is more commonly integrated with on-premises systems due to security concerns, while Xkit is often used for cloud-based or SaaS applications.
6. **Integration Partners**: Xkit may have more integration partners and connectors available to simplify the implementation process, while Casbin may require more customization for specific use cases and integrations.

In Summary, the key differences between Casbin and Xkit lie in their implementation language, license, focus, community support, deployment options, and integration partners.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Casbin
Casbin
Xkit
Xkit

In Casbin, an access control model is abstracted into a CONF file based on the PERM metamodel (Policy, Effect, Request, Matchers). So switching or upgrading the authorization mechanism for a project is just as simple as modifying a configuration. You can customize your own access control model by combining the available models.

Xkit manages the process of getting authorization to connect to your users' 3rd party SaaS apps so you can focus on building your integrations.

-
Integration with OAuth2 without a backend; Works with Firebase Auth, Auth0, AWS Cognito, and most other authentication systems; Embed or link to a pre-built integration catalog; Retrieve access tokens on the front- or back-end for clean separation of concerns
Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
39
Stacks
3
Followers
78
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
HubSpot
HubSpot
Trello
Trello
Confluence
Confluence
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Dropbox
Dropbox
Slack
Slack
Google Drive
Google Drive
Asana
Asana
Zoom
Zoom
Gmail
Gmail

What are some alternatives to Casbin, Xkit?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

Apache Camel

Apache Camel

An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope