StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. cdnjs vs npm

cdnjs vs npm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

npm
npm
Stacks137.4K
Followers82.2K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks3.0K
cdnjs
cdnjs
Stacks112
Followers114
Votes11
GitHub Stars10.6K
Forks4.5K

cdnjs vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When it comes to managing and integrating libraries and dependencies into a website or web application, two commonly used tools are cdnjs and npm. While both serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Library Management System:

    cdnjs is primarily a content delivery network (CDN) that hosts and delivers popular JavaScript libraries, CSS files, fonts, and other web assets. It provides an easy way to include external libraries on a website by simply referencing the library's URL. On the other hand, npm is a package manager for JavaScript that is used to manage libraries and dependencies within a project. It allows developers to easily install, update, and remove packages from their projects, making it easier to handle complex dependencies.

  2. Scalability:

    cdnjs is designed to handle large amounts of traffic and serve files globally through multiple servers. This makes it highly scalable and ensures fast delivery of assets to users across the globe. npm, on the other hand, is primarily focused on managing packages within a project and does not provide the same level of scalability as cdnjs.

  3. Package Versioning:

    npm provides a robust versioning system that allows developers to specify the exact version of a package they want to use in their project. This ensures that the project remains stable and consistent, as any updates to the package will not affect the project unless explicitly specified. cdnjs, on the other hand, does not provide versioning. Instead, it serves the latest version of a library by default. While this can be convenient for quick prototyping or development, it may introduce compatibility issues if the latest version of a library is not compatible with the project.

  4. Package Availability:

    npm has a vast and diverse ecosystem of packages available in its registry. This means that developers have a wide range of options to choose from when it comes to finding libraries and dependencies for their projects. cdnjs, on the other hand, has a more limited selection of libraries and is primarily focused on hosting popular and widely used libraries.

  5. Development Workflow:

    npm is often used during the development phase of a project and is integrated into the build process to handle dependencies. It allows developers to easily install, update, and manage packages, making development more efficient. cdnjs, on the other hand, is typically used in production environments to serve static assets to end-users. It does not have the same level of development-focused features as npm.

  6. Community and Collaboration:

    npm has a large and active community of developers, which means that there is a vast amount of documentation, resources, and support available. It also facilitates collaboration between developers, as packages can be easily shared and published to the npm registry. cdnjs, on the other hand, does not have the same level of community and collaboration features as npm. It is primarily focused on hosting and delivering libraries.

In summary, cdnjs is a CDN that hosts and delivers web assets, while npm is a package manager for managing libraries and dependencies within a project. cdnjs is highly scalable and provides an easy way to include external libraries on a website, while npm offers a wider range of packages, versioning control, and a more robust development workflow.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on npm, cdnjs

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
Mark
Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

ReviewonReactReactTypeScriptTypeScriptYarnYarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm
npm
cdnjs
cdnjs

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Everyone loves the Google CDN? Even Microsoft runs their own CDN. The problem is, they only host the most popular libraries. We host it all - JavaScript, CSS, SWF, images, etc! Powered by CloudFlare.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
10.6K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
4.5K
Stacks
137.4K
Stacks
112
Followers
82.2K
Followers
114
Votes
1.6K
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 648
    Best package management system for javascript
  • 382
    Open-source
  • 327
    Great community
  • 148
    More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist
  • 112
    Nice people matter
Cons
  • 5
    Problems with lockfiles
  • 5
    Bad at package versioning and being deterministic
  • 3
    Node-gyp takes forever
  • 1
    Super slow
Pros
  • 4
    Fast
  • 4
    Free
  • 2
    Easy Interface
  • 1
    Most number of libraries
  • 1
    Largest user base
Integrations
No integrations available
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Node.js
Node.js
GitHub
GitHub
WordPress
WordPress
Atom
Atom
Vim
Vim

What are some alternatives to npm, cdnjs?

CloudFlare

CloudFlare

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

KeyCDN

KeyCDN

KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Fastly

Fastly

Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

MaxCDN

MaxCDN

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.

jsDelivr

jsDelivr

jsDelivr is a free CDN for open source developers, with advanced features for javascript projects with access to NPM and Github It uses multiple CDN providers, resulting in the best possible uptime and performance.

Moovweb XDN

Moovweb XDN

All-in-one platform to develop, deploy, preview, experiment on, monitor, and run your frontend.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot