Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Celery vs Redis: What are the differences?
Celery is a distributed task queue system while Redis is an in-memory data structure store. Let's explore the key differences between them.
Message Broker vs. Data Store: Celery is essentially a message broker that allows you to manage and distribute tasks across multiple processing units or machines. On the other hand, Redis is primarily a data store that provides fast in-memory storage and retrieval of data.
Task Processing vs. Data Manipulation: Another major difference is the core functionality they provide. Celery is designed to handle the processing of tasks in a distributed manner, where tasks are typically functions or methods that need to be executed asynchronously. Redis, on the other hand, focuses on data manipulation and provides various data structures like strings, lists, sets, and more.
Task Queues vs. Data Structures: Celery utilizes task queues to manage and distribute tasks. It allows you to create queues, prioritize tasks, and distribute them based on availability of workers. In contrast, Redis provides a wide range of data structures like strings, lists, sets, and hashes, which can be used for various purposes including caching, real-time analytics, and more.
Concurrency vs. Persistence: Celery handles task concurrency by allowing multiple workers to process tasks concurrently. It provides a way to scale and distribute tasks across multiple machines. Redis, on the other hand, focuses more on data persistence rather than concurrency. It ensures data durability by allowing you to persist data to disk and provides various mechanisms for replication and fault tolerance.
Task Routing vs. Pub/Sub Messaging: Celery provides flexible task routing mechanisms, allowing you to route tasks to different workers based on predefined rules. It also supports various task result backend options for retrieving the results of completed tasks. Redis, on the other hand, supports publish/subscribe messaging, where you can publish messages to specific channels and subscribers can receive those messages.
Integration with other technologies: Celery integrates well with other technologies and frameworks like Django, Flask, and more. It provides convenient wrappers and utilities for integrating with these frameworks. Redis also has good integration with different programming languages and frameworks, making it easy to use in various application architectures.
In summary, Celery focuses on task processing using task queues and supports task routing and result backends. Redis, on the other hand, is primarily a data store that supports various data structures and provides pub/sub messaging capabilities.
I am just a beginner at these two technologies.
Problem statement: I am getting lakh of users from the sequel server for whom I need to create caches in MongoDB by making different REST API requests.
Here these users can be treated as messages. Each REST API request is a task.
I am confused about whether I should go for RabbitMQ alone or Celery.
If I have to go with RabbitMQ, I prefer to use python with Pika module. But the challenge with Pika is, it is not thread-safe. So I am not finding a way to execute a lakh of API requests in parallel using multiple threads using Pika.
If I have to go with Celery, I don't know how I can achieve better scalability in executing these API requests in parallel.
For large amounts of small tasks and caches I have had good luck with Redis and RQ. I have not personally used celery but I am fairly sure it would scale well, and I have not used RabbitMQ for anything besides communication between services. If you prefer python my suggestions should feel comfortable.
Sorry I do not have a more information
Pros of Celery
- Task queue99
- Python integration63
- Django integration40
- Scheduled Task30
- Publish/subsribe19
- Various backend broker8
- Easy to use6
- Great community5
- Workflow5
- Free4
- Dynamic1
Pros of Redis
- Performance887
- Super fast542
- Ease of use514
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable165
- Free156
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Pub/Sub23
- Great community22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- Lists10
- NoSQL10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Bitmaps8
- Open Source7
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Runs server side LUA4
- Transactions4
- Networked4
- Outstanding performance4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Scalable2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Celery
- Sometimes loses tasks4
- Depends on broker1
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1