Chef vs Rundeck

Overview

Chef

Stacks1.3K

Followers1.1K

Votes345

Rundeck

Stacks204

Followers343

Votes7

Chef vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Chef and Rundeck for Website Development

Installation and Configuration: In terms of installation and configuration, Chef requires more setup and complexity as compared to Rundeck. Chef involves the creation and management of a Chef server, which stores and distributes configuration information, while Rundeck can be set up quickly and easily with minimal configuration.
Workflow Automation and Orchestration: While both Chef and Rundeck provide workflow automation and orchestration capabilities, Chef focuses on configuration management and continuous delivery, whereas Rundeck offers a broader range of functionality for job scheduling, execution, and monitoring across various platforms and infrastructure.
Technical Complexity: Chef involves writing complex recipes and cookbooks using a Ruby-based DSL (Domain-Specific Language) to define and manage infrastructure configurations. On the other hand, Rundeck provides a more accessible and user-friendly interface with a simple YAML-based job definition format that allows easy creation and management of jobs.
Target Environment Support: Chef primarily focuses on server and infrastructure configuration management, making it more suitable for managing large-scale environments with complex configurations. Rundeck, on the other hand, supports a wide range of target environments, including servers, cloud platforms, and databases, making it more versatile for managing diverse environments.
Community and Ecosystem: Chef has a larger and more active community, offering a vast collection of community-contributed cookbooks and resources. Rundeck, although having a smaller community, still provides a decent number of plugins and integrations for various tools and services, enabling seamless integration within a DevOps toolchain.
Pricing and Licensing: Chef offers both an open-source version (Chef Infra) and a commercial version (Chef Automate) with additional features and support. The commercial version requires licensing based on node count, making it more costly for large-scale deployments. Rundeck, on the other hand, is entirely open-source, allowing unlimited usage without any licensing costs.

In Summary, Chef is known for its robust configuration management and continuous delivery capabilities, while Rundeck excels in job scheduling, execution, and management across diverse platforms. Chef requires more technical expertise and server infrastructure, whereas Rundeck offers easier setup and support for various target environments. Chef has a larger community and both open-source and commercial versions, while Rundeck is entirely open-source and free to use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Chef, Rundeck

Anonymous

Sep 17, 2019

Needs advice

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Chef	Rundeck
Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.	A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.
Access to 800+ Reusable Cookbooks;Integration with Leading Cloud Providers;Enterprise Platform Support including Windows and Solaris;Create, Bootstrap and Manage OpenStack Clouds;Easy Installation with 'one-click' Omnibus Installer;Automatic System Discovery with Ohai;Text-Based Search Capabilities;Multiple Environment Support;"Knife" Command Line Interface;"Dry Run" Mode for Testing Potential Changes;Manage 10,000+ Nodes on a Single Chef Server;Available as a Hosted Service;Centralized Activity and Resource Reporting;"Push" Command and Control Client Runs;Multi-Tenancy;Role-Based Access Control [RBAC];High Availability Installation Support and Verification;Centralized Authentication Using LDAP or Active Directory	-
Statistics
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 204
Followers 1.1K	Followers 343
Votes 345	Votes 7
Pros & Cons
Pros 110 Dynamic and idempotent server configuration 76 Reusable components 47 Integration testing with Vagrant 43 Repeatable 30 Mock testing with Chefspec	Pros 3 Easy to understand 3 Role based access control 1 Doesn't need containers
Integrations
Amazon EC2 Rackspace Cloud Servers Microsoft Azure HP Cloud Compute Joyent Cloud	Ansible Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Chef, Rundeck?

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Mina

Mina works really fast because it's a deploy Bash script generator. It generates an entire procedure as a Bash script and runs it remotely in the server. Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is run separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead.

Related Comparisons

Chef vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Chef and Rundeck for Website Development

Installation and Configuration: In terms of installation and configuration, Chef requires more setup and complexity as compared to Rundeck. Chef involves the creation and management of a Chef server, which stores and distributes configuration information, while Rundeck can be set up quickly and easily with minimal configuration.
Workflow Automation and Orchestration: While both Chef and Rundeck provide workflow automation and orchestration capabilities, Chef focuses on configuration management and continuous delivery, whereas Rundeck offers a broader range of functionality for job scheduling, execution, and monitoring across various platforms and infrastructure.
Technical Complexity: Chef involves writing complex recipes and cookbooks using a Ruby-based DSL (Domain-Specific Language) to define and manage infrastructure configurations. On the other hand, Rundeck provides a more accessible and user-friendly interface with a simple YAML-based job definition format that allows easy creation and management of jobs.
Target Environment Support: Chef primarily focuses on server and infrastructure configuration management, making it more suitable for managing large-scale environments with complex configurations. Rundeck, on the other hand, supports a wide range of target environments, including servers, cloud platforms, and databases, making it more versatile for managing diverse environments.
Community and Ecosystem: Chef has a larger and more active community, offering a vast collection of community-contributed cookbooks and resources. Rundeck, although having a smaller community, still provides a decent number of plugins and integrations for various tools and services, enabling seamless integration within a DevOps toolchain.
Pricing and Licensing: Chef offers both an open-source version (Chef Infra) and a commercial version (Chef Automate) with additional features and support. The commercial version requires licensing based on node count, making it more costly for large-scale deployments. Rundeck, on the other hand, is entirely open-source, allowing unlimited usage without any licensing costs.

Chef vs Rundeck

Overview

Chef vs Rundeck: What are the differences?