StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. CircleCI vs CloudBees

CircleCI vs CloudBees

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudBees
CloudBees
Stacks108
Followers164
Votes6
CircleCI
CircleCI
Stacks14.5K
Followers7.1K
Votes974

CircleCI vs CloudBees: What are the differences?

Introduction

CircleCI and CloudBees are two popular continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) platforms that help companies automate their software development processes. While both platforms provide similar functionality, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration with Other Tools: CircleCI offers seamless integrations with various development and deployment tools, such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and Docker. It provides easy setup and configuration with these tools, allowing developers to streamline their workflow. On the other hand, CloudBees offers a broader range of integrations with enterprise-grade tools like Jira, Slack, and Jenkins. These integrations make it suitable for larger organizations with complex development environments.

  2. Scalability: CircleCI is known for its simplicity and scalability. It offers a cloud-based platform that can handle projects of any size. With its container-based infrastructure, CircleCI can quickly spin up and down compute resources as needed, making it suitable for startups or smaller teams with unpredictable workloads. CloudBees, on the other hand, is designed to handle complex enterprise-scale projects. It offers highly scalable solutions with features like distributed builds and the ability to manage multiple instances, making it ideal for large organizations with extensive development needs.

  3. Pricing Model: CircleCI operates on a pay-as-you-go pricing model. It offers a range of plans, including a free tier for small projects with limited requirements. The cost increases based on the number of concurrent builds and additional features needed. On the other hand, CloudBees follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a regular fee for access to the platform's features and support. The pricing is based on the number of users, projects, and additional features required. This model may be more suitable for organizations that prefer a predictable and fixed budget.

  4. Ease of Use: CircleCI focuses on providing a simple and user-friendly interface. Its intuitive design allows developers to get started quickly without extensive configuration. It offers a straightforward setup process and offers extensive documentation and support resources. CloudBees, on the other hand, provides a more feature-rich and advanced user interface. Its platform caters to experienced users who require more customization and flexibility in their CI/CD pipelines. However, this complexity may result in a steeper learning curve for new users.

  5. Deployment Options: CircleCI primarily offers a cloud-based deployment model. This allows developers to quickly set up and use the platform without worrying about infrastructure management. However, it may not be suitable for organizations with strict security or compliance requirements that require on-premises deployments. CloudBees accommodates both cloud-based and on-premises deployment models. This flexibility makes it suitable for organizations with specific security or regulatory needs.

  6. Enterprise-Grade Features: CloudBees offers a range of enterprise-grade features that cater to larger organizations. These include features like high availability, distributed builds, role-based access control, and advanced security options. CircleCI, while suitable for small to medium-sized projects, may not provide the same level of features and capabilities required by larger enterprises.

In summary, CircleCI and CloudBees are both CI/CD platforms that provide automation for software development processes. However, CircleCI focuses on simplicity, ease of use, and scalability, making it suitable for smaller projects and startups. CloudBees, on the other hand, offers a more feature-rich platform with enterprise-grade capabilities, making it a better fit for larger organizations with complex development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CloudBees, CircleCI

Dustin
Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

ReviewonCircleCICircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k
Comments
Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CloudBees
CloudBees
CircleCI
CircleCI

Enables organizations to build, test and deploy applications to production, utilizing continuous delivery practices. They are focused solely on Jenkins as a tool for continuous delivery both on-premises and in the cloud.

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Hosted CI/CD as a Service; Flexible and governed software delivery automation; Starter Kit; Jenkins Product Support
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights
Statistics
Stacks
108
Stacks
14.5K
Followers
164
Followers
7.1K
Votes
6
Votes
974
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Jenkins
Pros
  • 226
    Github integration
  • 177
    Easy setup
  • 153
    Fast builds
  • 94
    Competitively priced
  • 74
    Slack integration
Cons
  • 12
    Unstable
  • 6
    Scammy pricing structure
  • 0
    Aggressive Github permissions
Integrations
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Codeship
Codeship
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Jenkins
Jenkins
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Docker
Docker
dotCloud
dotCloud
GitHub
GitHub
Xcode
Xcode
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Slack
Slack
Heroku
Heroku
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to CloudBees, CircleCI?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot