CircleCI vs GitHub Enterprise

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

GitHub Enterprise

Stacks500

Followers627

Votes10

CircleCI vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

Integration with Version Control Systems: CircleCI is tightly integrated with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing seamless integration and automation of build, test, and deploy processes. GitHub Enterprise, on the other hand, is a self-hosted version of GitHub that provides on-premises solutions for enterprises with high security and compliance requirements.
Pricing Model: CircleCI offers a range of pricing plans based on the number of containers and parallel jobs needed, making it suitable for small to large projects. In contrast, GitHub Enterprise pricing is based on the number of users, which can make it more expensive for organizations with a large number of developers.
Customizability and Control: With CircleCI, users have more control and customization options over their build and deployment processes through configuration files and plugins. GitHub Enterprise provides a more standardized platform with limited customization options, which can be a constraint for organizations with specific requirements.
Support and Documentation: CircleCI offers comprehensive documentation, community forums, and support options to assist users with troubleshooting and optimizing their CI/CD workflows. GitHub Enterprise, while providing support, may have limited resources for self-hosted instances, requiring users to rely more on internal expertise or third-party support.
Scalability and Performance: CircleCI is known for its scalability and fast build times, making it suitable for projects that require rapid feedback and deployment cycles. GitHub Enterprise is designed for larger organizations with in-house infrastructure, offering scalability but with potential performance limitations based on the hardware configuration.
Deployment Options: CircleCI supports deployment to various platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, providing flexibility in choosing deployment targets. GitHub Enterprise, being an on-premises solution, may have more limited deployment options depending on the internal infrastructure and policies of the organization.

In Summary, CircleCI and GitHub Enterprise differ in their integration with version control systems, pricing models, customizability, support and documentation, scalability and performance, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, GitHub Enterprise

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	GitHub Enterprise
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 500
Followers 7.1K	Followers 627
Votes 974	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 4 Expensive - $$$ 2 CDCI with Github Actions 2 Code security 1 Draft Pull Request 1 Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available Cons 2 $$$
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

CircleCI vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

Integration with Version Control Systems: CircleCI is tightly integrated with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing seamless integration and automation of build, test, and deploy processes. GitHub Enterprise, on the other hand, is a self-hosted version of GitHub that provides on-premises solutions for enterprises with high security and compliance requirements.
Pricing Model: CircleCI offers a range of pricing plans based on the number of containers and parallel jobs needed, making it suitable for small to large projects. In contrast, GitHub Enterprise pricing is based on the number of users, which can make it more expensive for organizations with a large number of developers.
Customizability and Control: With CircleCI, users have more control and customization options over their build and deployment processes through configuration files and plugins. GitHub Enterprise provides a more standardized platform with limited customization options, which can be a constraint for organizations with specific requirements.
Support and Documentation: CircleCI offers comprehensive documentation, community forums, and support options to assist users with troubleshooting and optimizing their CI/CD workflows. GitHub Enterprise, while providing support, may have limited resources for self-hosted instances, requiring users to rely more on internal expertise or third-party support.
Scalability and Performance: CircleCI is known for its scalability and fast build times, making it suitable for projects that require rapid feedback and deployment cycles. GitHub Enterprise is designed for larger organizations with in-house infrastructure, offering scalability but with potential performance limitations based on the hardware configuration.
Deployment Options: CircleCI supports deployment to various platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, providing flexibility in choosing deployment targets. GitHub Enterprise, being an on-premises solution, may have more limited deployment options depending on the internal infrastructure and policies of the organization.

CircleCI vs GitHub Enterprise

Overview