CircleCI vs Gogs

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Gogs

Stacks175

Followers306

Votes182

CircleCI vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of development and software engineering, tools such as CircleCI and Gogs play a crucial role in streamlining processes and improving efficiency.

Deployment Method: CircleCI is a cloud-based continuous integration and deployment tool, whereas Gogs is a self-hosted git service that allows for more control over the deployment environment.
Community Support: CircleCI has a larger and more active community, providing extensive resources, plugins, and integrations, while Gogs, although having a smaller community, offers a more personalized and customizable experience for users.
Scalability: CircleCI is more suitable for large-scale projects due to its robust infrastructure and scalability options, while Gogs is better suited for smaller teams or projects that do not require extensive resources.
Pricing Model: CircleCI follows a subscription-based pricing model, offering various plans based on the user's needs and project requirements, whereas Gogs is open-source and free to use, making it a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious developers.
User Interface: CircleCI provides a user-friendly web interface with intuitive features and easy navigation, making it ideal for beginners and experienced users alike, while Gogs offers a simpler and more minimalist interface, providing a no-frills experience focused on functionality.
Maintenance: With CircleCI being a cloud-based service, maintenance and updates are handled by the provider, reducing the workload on the user's end, whereas Gogs being self-hosted requires users to manage maintenance, updates, and security measures themselves.

In Summary, CircleCI and Gogs differ in deployment method, community support, scalability, pricing model, user interface, and maintenance requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Gogs

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Gogs
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)
Statistics
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 175
Followers 7.1K	Followers 306
Votes 974	Votes 182
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 36 Self-hosted github like service 31 Very low memory footprint 29 Easy to install / update 17 Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi 16 Single binary deploy no dependencies
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Gogs?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

CircleCI vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of development and software engineering, tools such as CircleCI and Gogs play a crucial role in streamlining processes and improving efficiency.

Deployment Method: CircleCI is a cloud-based continuous integration and deployment tool, whereas Gogs is a self-hosted git service that allows for more control over the deployment environment.
Community Support: CircleCI has a larger and more active community, providing extensive resources, plugins, and integrations, while Gogs, although having a smaller community, offers a more personalized and customizable experience for users.
Scalability: CircleCI is more suitable for large-scale projects due to its robust infrastructure and scalability options, while Gogs is better suited for smaller teams or projects that do not require extensive resources.
Pricing Model: CircleCI follows a subscription-based pricing model, offering various plans based on the user's needs and project requirements, whereas Gogs is open-source and free to use, making it a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious developers.
User Interface: CircleCI provides a user-friendly web interface with intuitive features and easy navigation, making it ideal for beginners and experienced users alike, while Gogs offers a simpler and more minimalist interface, providing a no-frills experience focused on functionality.
Maintenance: With CircleCI being a cloud-based service, maintenance and updates are handled by the provider, reducing the workload on the user's end, whereas Gogs being self-hosted requires users to manage maintenance, updates, and security measures themselves.

In Summary, CircleCI and Gogs differ in deployment method, community support, scalability, pricing model, user interface, and maintenance requirements.