Apache Maven vs CircleCI

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Apache Maven

Stacks3.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes414

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks2.8K

Apache Maven vs CircleCI: What are the differences?

Introduction: Apache Maven and CircleCI are prominent tools used in the software development process to automate various tasks such as building, testing, and deploying applications.

1. Project Management: Apache Maven primarily focuses on project management, handling dependencies, and build automation by using a project object model (POM) to define a project structure. On the other hand, CircleCI is more oriented towards continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines for software development.

2. Build Process: Maven follows a convention over configuration approach, providing predefined build phases and goals to streamline the build process. In contrast, CircleCI allows users to customize their build process using configuration files, providing more flexibility and control over the build pipeline.

3. Language Support: Maven is widely used in Java projects and has extensive support for Java applications, including managing dependencies through its central repository. CircleCI, on the other hand, supports a wide range of programming languages, making it suitable for multi-language projects.

4. Scalability: Apache Maven is better suited for managing complex project structures with multiple modules and dependencies, making it ideal for large-scale enterprise applications. CircleCI, being a cloud-based service, offers scalability and parallel execution capabilities for building and testing applications across different environments.

5. Integration with Tools: Maven seamlessly integrates with other tools such as Jenkins for continuous integration, SonarQube for code quality analysis, and Nexus for artifact repository management. CircleCI integrates with various version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, along with cloud services such as AWS and Google Cloud Platform for deployment.

6. Cost and Licensing: Apache Maven is an open-source tool released under the Apache License, making it free to use and distribute. In contrast, CircleCI offers both free and paid plans based on usage and additional features, making it a preferred choice for organizations looking for a fully managed CI/CD solution.

In Summary, Apache Maven and CircleCI differ in their focus on project management, build process customization, language support, scalability, integration with tools, and cost and licensing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Apache Maven
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.8K
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 3.4K
Followers 7.1K	Followers 1.7K
Votes 974	Votes 414
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 138 Dependency management 70 Necessary evil 60 I’d rather code my app, not my build 48 Publishing packaged artifacts 43 Convention over configuration Cons 6 Complex 1 Inconsistent buillds 0 Not many plugin-alternatives
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Apache Maven?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Apache Maven vs CircleCI: What are the differences?

Introduction: Apache Maven and CircleCI are prominent tools used in the software development process to automate various tasks such as building, testing, and deploying applications.

In Summary, Apache Maven and CircleCI differ in their focus on project management, build process customization, language support, scalability, integration with tools, and cost and licensing models.