StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Cloud Foundry vs Spring Cloud

Cloud Foundry vs Spring Cloud

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5
Spring Cloud
Spring Cloud
Stacks1.6K
Followers753
Votes0

Cloud Foundry vs Spring Cloud: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cloud Foundry and Spring Cloud are both popular platforms used for cloud application development and deployment. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Development Approach: Cloud Foundry is a fully integrated platform-as-a-service (PaaS) that provides a complete set of tools and services for application development and deployment. It offers a high level of abstraction, allowing developers to focus on writing code rather than worrying about infrastructure details. On the other hand, Spring Cloud is a framework that is built on top of Spring Boot, providing developers with a set of tools and libraries to develop and deploy microservices-based applications. It offers more flexibility and control over the development process.

  2. Backend Support: Cloud Foundry supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, including Java, Ruby, Node.js, and .NET. It provides a runtime environment for running applications written in these languages. Spring Cloud, on the other hand, is primarily focused on Java and the Spring framework. It offers a set of tools and libraries that are optimized for developing Java applications.

  3. Deployment Model: Cloud Foundry follows a multi-tenant deployment model, where multiple applications from different organizations can run on the same infrastructure. It provides isolation between applications using containers and virtualization. Spring Cloud, on the other hand, can be deployed in various ways, including as a standalone application, as a set of microservices, or as part of a larger application.

  4. Scaling and Load Balancing: Cloud Foundry provides built-in scaling and load balancing capabilities. It can automatically scale applications based on predefined rules and distribute the incoming traffic across multiple instances of an application. Spring Cloud, on the other hand, relies on external tools and technologies for scaling and load balancing. It can be integrated with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes to achieve auto-scaling and load balancing.

  5. Service Discovery and Configuration: Cloud Foundry provides a built-in service discovery and configuration management mechanism. It can automatically discover and connect applications to services like databases, messaging systems, and caching. It also provides a centralized configuration management system. Spring Cloud, on the other hand, relies on the Spring Cloud Netflix stack, which includes tools like Eureka for service discovery and Ribbon for client-side load balancing. It also provides a distributed configuration management system.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Cloud Foundry has a large and active community of users and contributors. It offers a marketplace of services and addons that can be used with Cloud Foundry applications. Spring Cloud also has a vibrant community and ecosystem. It leverages the existing Spring ecosystem, which includes a wide range of tools and libraries for building enterprise-grade applications.

In summary, Cloud Foundry is a fully integrated platform-as-a-service (PaaS) that offers a high level of abstraction and supports multiple programming languages. It provides built-in scaling, load balancing, service discovery, and configuration management capabilities. Spring Cloud, on the other hand, is a framework that provides a set of tools and libraries for developing and deploying microservices-based applications. It offers more flexibility and control over the development process and is primarily focused on Java and the Spring framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Spring Cloud
Spring Cloud

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

It provides tools for developers to quickly build some of the common patterns in distributed systems.

Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Distributed/versioned configuration; Service registration and discovery; Routing; Service-to-service calls; Load balancing; Circuit Breakers; Global locks; Leadership election and cluster state; Distributed messaging
Statistics
Stacks
188
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
346
Followers
753
Votes
5
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
No community feedback yet
Integrations
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Hystrix
Hystrix
Eureka
Eureka
Zuul
Zuul

What are some alternatives to Cloud Foundry, Spring Cloud?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase