StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Cloud Foundry

Apache Tomcat vs Cloud Foundry

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K

Apache Tomcat vs Cloud Foundry: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Tomcat and Cloud Foundry are both widely used platforms in the field of web application deployment and management. However, there are several key differences between the two that make them unique in their own ways. In this article, we will discuss six significant differences between Apache Tomcat and Cloud Foundry.

  1. Deployment Model: Apache Tomcat is a servlet container that can be downloaded, installed, and deployed on any server or operating system. It provides a lightweight solution to deploy Java-based web applications. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that provides a cloud-based environment for deploying applications. It manages the infrastructure, runtime, and other services, allowing developers to focus solely on writing code.

  2. Scalability: Apache Tomcat offers limited scalability options as it requires manual configuration and management of additional server instances for scaling. In contrast, Cloud Foundry provides automatic application scaling by dynamically adjusting the number of instances based on the workload. It can handle high traffic and workload variations without the need for manual intervention.

  3. Service Offerings: Apache Tomcat primarily focuses on providing a servlet container for running Java web applications. It does not offer additional built-in services like databases, caching, or messaging systems. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry provides a wide range of services, including databases, messaging queues, and caching systems. These services can be easily provisioned and bound to applications without any additional configurations.

  4. Multi-Tenancy: Apache Tomcat operates on a single-tenant model, where each instance is dedicated to a specific application. It does not have built-in support for managing multiple applications within the same instance. In contrast, Cloud Foundry supports multi-tenancy, allowing multiple applications to run within the same instance while isolating the resources and configurations of each application.

  5. Management and Operations: Apache Tomcat requires manual management and configuration for tasks like scaling, routing, and logging. It lacks advanced features for monitoring, logging, and centralized management of applications. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry provides an intuitive web-based dashboard for application management, scaling, and configuration. It also offers extensive monitoring and logging capabilities, making it easier to troubleshoot and debug applications.

  6. Flexibility and Portability: Apache Tomcat provides flexibility in terms of choosing the runtime environment, server configurations, and compatible frameworks. It can be run on any operating system and can be customized according to specific requirements. Cloud Foundry, on the other hand, offers a more standardized and portable environment. It enables the deployment of applications built on various programming languages, frameworks, and infrastructure providers without significant modifications.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is a lightweight servlet container that focuses on providing a basic runtime environment for Java web applications, while Cloud Foundry is a powerful PaaS platform that offers advanced functionalities like automatic scaling, multi-tenancy, and a wide range of service offerings.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Cloud Foundry, Apache Tomcat

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
188
Stacks
16.9K
Followers
346
Followers
12.6K
Votes
5
Votes
201
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
Integrations
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Cloud Foundry, Apache Tomcat?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase