Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cloudant

81
73
+ 1
28
Cloud Firestore

712
892
+ 1
111
Add tool

Cloud Firestore vs Cloudant: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Cloud Firestore and Cloudant, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two databases to make an informed decision for your project.

  1. Data Model: Cloud Firestore uses a flexible, document-based data model that allows developers to store data in collections and documents, making it easy to organize and retrieve data on a granular level. On the other hand, Cloudant utilizes a schemaless JSON document store, providing developers with flexibility in storing data but may require more effort in structuring the data efficiently.

  2. Scalability: Cloud Firestore offers automatic scaling capabilities, handling traffic spikes and high volumes of data with ease. It scales horizontally with built-in load balancing, ensuring optimal performance as your application grows. In contrast, Cloudant also provides horizontal scalability but may require more manual intervention and management to optimize performance as the database size increases.

  3. Transactions: Cloud Firestore supports multi-document transactions, allowing developers to perform operations on multiple documents in a transactional manner, ensuring data consistency. On the other hand, Cloudant does not natively support multi-document transactions, requiring developers to implement custom solutions or use external services for transactional operations.

  4. Real-time Synchronization: Cloud Firestore offers real-time synchronization through live listeners, enabling applications to receive updates in real-time when data changes in the database. This feature is particularly useful for building collaborative applications or chat functionalities. In comparison, while Cloudant provides replication and synchronization capabilities, it may require more manual configuration and setup to achieve real-time updates.

  5. Querying: Cloud Firestore offers powerful querying capabilities, allowing developers to perform complex queries, filtering, and sorting on the database without the need for secondary indexes. It also supports composite queries for querying on multiple fields simultaneously. In contrast, Cloudant requires the creation of secondary indexes for efficient querying, which may involve additional maintenance and resources.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Cloud Firestore and Cloudant, such as the data model, scalability, transactions, real-time synchronization, and querying capabilities, is crucial for selecting the right database solution for your project.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Cloudant
Pros of Cloud Firestore
  • 13
    JSON
  • 7
    REST interface
  • 4
    Cheap
  • 3
    JavaScript support
  • 1
    Great syncing
  • 15
    Easy to use
  • 15
    Cloud Storage
  • 12
    Realtime Database
  • 12
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Super fast
  • 8
    Authentication
  • 6
    Realtime listeners
  • 5
    Could Messaging
  • 5
    Hosting
  • 5
    Google Analytics integration
  • 4
    Performance Monitoring
  • 4
    Crash Reporting
  • 3
    Sharing App via invites
  • 3
    Test Lab for Android
  • 3
    Adwords, Admob integration
  • 2
    Dynamic Links (Deeplinking support)
  • 0
    Robust ALI

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cloudant
Cons of Cloud Firestore
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 8
      Doesn't support FullTextSearch natively

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Cloudant?

    Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

    What is Cloud Firestore?

    Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Cloudant?
    What companies use Cloud Firestore?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Cloudant or Cloud Firestore.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Cloudant?
    What tools integrate with Cloud Firestore?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Cloudant and Cloud Firestore?
    CouchDB
    Apache CouchDB is a database that uses JSON for documents, JavaScript for MapReduce indexes, and regular HTTP for its API. CouchDB is a database that completely embraces the web. Store your data with JSON documents. Access your documents and query your indexes with your web browser, via HTTP. Index, combine, and transform your documents with JavaScript.
    Elasticsearch
    Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).
    Couchbase
    Developed as an alternative to traditionally inflexible SQL databases, the Couchbase NoSQL database is built on an open source foundation and architected to help developers solve real-world problems and meet high scalability demands.
    Firebase
    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    See all alternatives