Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CloudFlare vs jsDelivr: What are the differences?
CloudFlare and jsDelivr are both content delivery networks (CDNs) that help optimize website performance, enhance security, and improve user experience. However, they have several key differences that set them apart.
Pricing Model: CloudFlare offers both free and paid plans, allowing users to choose the level of service that best fits their needs. In contrast, jsDelivr is completely free to use for all its features, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious website owners.
Focus: CloudFlare is primarily focused on providing a range of security features, including protection against DDoS attacks, web application firewall, bot mitigation, and SSL encryption. On the other hand, jsDelivr focuses solely on accelerating content delivery, providing a lightning-fast global network and efficient caching mechanisms.
Supported Technologies: CloudFlare supports a wide range of web technologies, including HTTP/2, IPv6, DNSSEC, and TLS 1.3. It also offers numerous integrations with popular website platforms. In contrast, jsDelivr specializes in delivering JavaScript, CSS, and other static files, making it ideal for developers and webmasters looking to optimize the delivery of these assets.
Ease of Use: CloudFlare provides a comprehensive dashboard with numerous settings and features, which can be overwhelming for novice users. On the other hand, jsDelivr has a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy to configure and start using without any technical expertise.
Performance Optimization: CloudFlare employs a range of optimization techniques, such as image compression, minification, and caching to improve website performance. Additionally, it has a global network of data centers for faster content delivery. jsDelivr, however, specializes in providing a fast and reliable delivery infrastructure specifically for JavaScript and other static files, resulting in optimized load times for these types of assets.
Anycast Network: CloudFlare operates an Anycast network, which means that requests are routed to the nearest data center, reducing latency and improving overall performance. jsDelivr, on the other hand, does not have its own Anycast network but leverages multiple CDN providers to ensure content is delivered efficiently.
In Summary, CloudFlare offers a comprehensive range of security features and broader support for various web technologies, while jsDelivr specializes in accelerating the delivery of JavaScript and static files and provides a simpler, free-to-use solution.
I don't think I have registered a domain in the last 10 years that hasn't been linked to CloudFlare within the first 2 hours from registration.
The benefits you get from even the free version of CloudFlare are amazing. From day 0: - 30/80% of bandwidth savings thanks to their CDN - Origin IP address protection - Managed SSL
Pros of CloudFlare
- Easy setup, great cdn424
- Free ssl277
- Easy setup199
- Security190
- Ssl180
- Great cdn98
- Optimizer77
- Simple71
- Great UI44
- Great js cdn28
- Apps12
- HTTP/2 Support12
- DNS Analytics12
- AutoMinify12
- Rocket Loader9
- Ipv69
- Easy9
- IPv6 "One Click"8
- Fantastic CDN service8
- DNSSEC7
- Nice DNS7
- SSHFP7
- Free GeoIP7
- Amazing performance7
- API7
- Cheapest SSL7
- SPDY6
- Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else6
- Ubuntu5
- Asynchronous resource loading5
- Global Load Balancing4
- Performance4
- Easy Use4
- CDN3
- Registrar2
- Support for SSHFP records2
- Web31
- Прохси1
- HTTPS3/Quic1
Pros of jsDelivr
- Its fast9
- Diverse POPs and support8
- Free8
- Many packages available7
- Load multiple files with single HTTP request6
- Auto-minification by changing url extension to .min.js3
- View pkg download statistics per week/month/year3
- Can add OSS packages I use3
- Worked in China2
- Easy setup, great cdn1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of CloudFlare
- No support for SSHFP records2
- Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits2