StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache Spark vs Cloudflow

Apache Spark vs Cloudflow

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Stacks3.1K
Followers3.5K
Votes140
GitHub Stars42.2K
Forks28.9K
Cloudflow
Cloudflow
Stacks5
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars323
Forks89

Apache Spark vs Cloudflow: What are the differences?

<Apache Spark vs Cloudflow>

1. **Programming Model**: Apache Spark follows a generic data processing model, while Cloudflow is specifically designed for building streaming data pipelines with Akka Streams and Kubernetes.
2. **Scalability**: Apache Spark is known for its ability to handle large-scale data processing, while Cloudflow focuses on streaming data processing at scale with built-in support for Kubernetes for distributed computing.
3. **Resource Management**: Apache Spark provides its own resource management system, whereas Cloudflow leverages Kubernetes for efficient resource allocation and management.
4. **Built-in Components**: Apache Spark offers a wide range of core and additional libraries for various data processing tasks, while Cloudflow focuses on providing specific building blocks for building streaming applications such as streamlets, blueprints, and operators.
5. **Development Environment**: Apache Spark is more suitable for batch processing but can also handle streaming data, whereas Cloudflow is designed specifically for building and deploying streaming applications in a cloud-native environment.
6. **Community Support**: Apache Spark has a larger and more established open-source community compared to Cloudflow, which is a relatively newer framework, leading to differences in available resources, documentations, and support options.

In Summary, Apache Spark and Cloudflow differ in their programming model, scalability, resource management, built-in components, development environment, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Spark, Cloudflow

Nilesh
Nilesh

Technical Architect at Self Employed

Jul 8, 2020

Needs adviceonElasticsearchElasticsearchKafkaKafka

We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.

In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.

In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.

576k views576k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Cloudflow
Cloudflow

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

It enables you to quickly develop, orchestrate, and operate distributed streaming applications on Kubernetes. With Cloudflow, streaming applications are comprised of small composable components wired together with schema-based contracts. It can dramatically accelerate streaming application development—​reducing the time required to create, package, and deploy—​from weeks to hours.

Run programs up to 100x faster than Hadoop MapReduce in memory, or 10x faster on disk;Write applications quickly in Java, Scala or Python;Combine SQL, streaming, and complex analytics;Spark runs on Hadoop, Mesos, standalone, or in the cloud. It can access diverse data sources including HDFS, Cassandra, HBase, S3
Apache Spark, Apache Flink, and Akka Streams; Focus only on business logic, leave the boilerplate to us; We provide all the tooling for going from business logic to a deployable Docker image; We provide Kubernetes tooling to deploy your distributed system with a single command, and manage durable connections between processing stages; With a Lightbend subscription, you get all the tools you need to provide insights, observability, and lifecycle management for evolving your distributed streaming application
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42.2K
GitHub Stars
323
GitHub Forks
28.9K
GitHub Forks
89
Stacks
3.1K
Stacks
5
Followers
3.5K
Followers
13
Votes
140
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Open-source
  • 48
    Fast and Flexible
  • 8
    One platform for every big data problem
  • 8
    Great for distributed SQL like applications
  • 6
    Easy to install and to use
Cons
  • 4
    Speed
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Akka
Akka
Apache Flink
Apache Flink

What are some alternatives to Apache Spark, Cloudflow?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase