Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Spark vs Cloudflow: What are the differences?
<Apache Spark vs Cloudflow>
1. **Programming Model**: Apache Spark follows a generic data processing model, while Cloudflow is specifically designed for building streaming data pipelines with Akka Streams and Kubernetes.
2. **Scalability**: Apache Spark is known for its ability to handle large-scale data processing, while Cloudflow focuses on streaming data processing at scale with built-in support for Kubernetes for distributed computing.
3. **Resource Management**: Apache Spark provides its own resource management system, whereas Cloudflow leverages Kubernetes for efficient resource allocation and management.
4. **Built-in Components**: Apache Spark offers a wide range of core and additional libraries for various data processing tasks, while Cloudflow focuses on providing specific building blocks for building streaming applications such as streamlets, blueprints, and operators.
5. **Development Environment**: Apache Spark is more suitable for batch processing but can also handle streaming data, whereas Cloudflow is designed specifically for building and deploying streaming applications in a cloud-native environment.
6. **Community Support**: Apache Spark has a larger and more established open-source community compared to Cloudflow, which is a relatively newer framework, leading to differences in available resources, documentations, and support options.
In Summary, Apache Spark and Cloudflow differ in their programming model, scalability, resource management, built-in components, development environment, and community support.
We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.
In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.
In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.
The first solution that came to me is to use upsert to update ElasticSearch:
- Use the primary-key as ES document id
- Upsert the records to ES as soon as you receive them. As you are using upsert, the 2nd record of the same primary-key will not overwrite the 1st one, but will be merged with it.
Cons: The load on ES will be higher, due to upsert.
To use Flink:
- Create a KeyedDataStream by the primary-key
- In the ProcessFunction, save the first record in a State. At the same time, create a Timer for 15 minutes in the future
- When the 2nd record comes, read the 1st record from the State, merge those two, and send out the result, and clear the State and the Timer if it has not fired
- When the Timer fires, read the 1st record from the State and send out as the output record.
- Have a 2nd Timer of 6 hours (or more) if you are not using Windowing to clean up the State
Pro: if you have already having Flink ingesting this stream. Otherwise, I would just go with the 1st solution.
Please refer "Structured Streaming" feature of Spark. Refer "Stream - Stream Join" at https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/structured-streaming-programming-guide.html#stream-stream-joins . In short you need to specify "Define watermark delays on both inputs" and "Define a constraint on time across the two inputs"
Pros of Cloudflow
Pros of Apache Spark
- Open-source61
- Fast and Flexible48
- One platform for every big data problem8
- Great for distributed SQL like applications8
- Easy to install and to use6
- Works well for most Datascience usecases3
- Interactive Query2
- Machine learning libratimery, Streaming in real2
- In memory Computation2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Cloudflow
Cons of Apache Spark
- Speed4