Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CockroachDB vs Memcached: What are the differences?
Introduction
Here we will discuss the key differences between CockroachDB and Memcached.
Scalability: CockroachDB is designed to be a scalable, distributed SQL database that can handle large volumes of data across multiple machines and clusters. It provides horizontal scalability by automatically sharding data and distributing it across nodes. On the other hand, Memcached is an in-memory key-value store primarily used for caching data. It does not provide built-in mechanisms for scaling out data across multiple nodes or clusters.
Data Persistence: CockroachDB offers durable and consistent data persistence by automatically replicating data across different nodes. It uses a distributed consensus protocol to ensure replication and fault tolerance. In contrast, Memcached does not provide built-in support for data persistence. It stores data solely in memory and relies on the application to handle any persistence requirements.
Data Model: CockroachDB is a SQL database that supports complex data models, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. It provides ACID transaction support and allows for complex queries using SQL. Memcached, on the other hand, is a simple key-value store that only supports basic operations such as get, set, and delete. It does not support complex data structures or querying capabilities.
Memory Usage: CockroachDB replicates data across nodes and stores it on disk, which requires more memory compared to Memcached, which stores data solely in memory. Therefore, CockroachDB generally requires more memory resources compared to Memcached.
Cache Capabilities: While CockroachDB does have some caching mechanisms, its primary focus is on data persistence and strong consistency. On the other hand, Memcached is specifically designed for caching data in memory, which makes it more efficient in serving high volumes of read-intensive workloads.
Deployment and Use Case: CockroachDB is commonly used as a general-purpose database in applications that require distributed, highly available, and scalable data storage. It is suitable for use cases where strong consistency and SQL querying capabilities are essential. Memcached, on the other hand, is primarily used as a caching layer to improve the performance of web applications by reducing the load on database servers.
In summary, CockroachDB is a scalable, distributed SQL database with strong consistency and complex query support, while Memcached is an in-memory key-value store primarily used for caching data, with a focus on high read performance and simplicity.
Pros of CockroachDB
Pros of Memcached
- Fast object cache139
- High-performance129
- Stable91
- Mature65
- Distributed caching system33
- Improved response time and throughput11
- Great for caching HTML3
- Putta2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of CockroachDB
Cons of Memcached
- Only caches simple types2