Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Codacy vs Stylelint: What are the differences?
Introduction: In the comparison between Codacy and Stylelint, it is essential to highlight the key differences between these two tools used for code quality analysis and style checking in web development projects.
- Type of Tool: Codacy is a code quality platform that supports multiple programming languages and integrates with version control systems, while Stylelint is specifically a tool focused on analyzing and enforcing CSS styles in web development projects.
- Supported Languages: Codacy provides support for a wide range of programming languages beyond CSS, such as JavaScript, Python, Java, and more, whereas Stylelint is primarily focused on CSS styling rules and conventions.
- Rule Customization: Codacy offers a more customizable rule set for analyzing code quality and applying coding standards, enabling users to define their specific requirements, while Stylelint provides a predefined set of rules specifically tailored for CSS styling best practices.
- Integration: Codacy integrates seamlessly with popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, providing continuous analysis and feedback on code quality during the development process, whereas Stylelint can be incorporated into build processes or IDEs for static analysis of CSS files.
- Automation: Codacy automates code reviews and quality checks by analyzing each commit and pull request, identifying issues and suggesting improvements in real-time, while Stylelint requires manual execution or integration to run static analysis on CSS files.
- Scope of Analysis: Codacy offers a broader scope of code analysis beyond style checks, including code complexity, duplication, and security vulnerabilities, whereas Stylelint focuses solely on enforcing CSS styling rules and conventions.
In Summary, Codacy is a comprehensive code quality platform supporting multiple languages with customizable rules and automated analysis, whereas Stylelint is a specialized tool for enforcing CSS styling conventions through predefined rules and static analysis.
Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.
It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.
I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.
And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).
Any recommendation is appreciated.
In the case of .js files I would recommend using both Eslint and Prettier.
You can set up Prettier as an Eslint rule using the following plugin:
https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier
And in order to avoid conflicts between Prettier and Eslint, you can use this config:
https://github.com/prettier/eslint-config-prettier
Which turns off all Eslint rules that are unnecessary or might conflict with Prettier.
you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.
while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.
prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.
i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.
for my teams i set it up like this: - eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support - eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it) - vscode workspace config: format on save - separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting - precommit hooks (husky)
so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)
Pura vida! Well, I had a similar issue and at the end I decided to use Stylelint + Prettier for that job, in our case, we wanted that our linting process includes the SCSS files and not only the JS file, base on that we concluded that using only ESLint to do both things wasn't the best option, so, we integrated prettier with Stylelint, and for that we used a neat plugin that allowed us to use Prettier inside Stylelint here is the link, https://github.com/prettier/stylelint-prettier#recommended-configuration, I hope that this can help you, hasta pronto!, :)
Pros of Codacy
- Automated code review45
- Easy setup35
- Free for open source29
- Customizable20
- Helps reduce technical debt18
- Better coding14
- Best scala support13
- Faster Employee Onboarding11
- Duplication detector10
- Great UI10
- PHP integration9
- Python inspection6
- Tools for JVM analysis5
- Many integrations5
- Github Integration4
- Must-have for Java3
- Easy Travis integration3
- Items can be ignored in the UI3
- Asdasdas3
- Gitlab2
- Asdas0
Pros of Stylelint
- Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS5
- Only complains about real problems1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Codacy
- No support for private Git or Azure DevOps git6
Cons of Stylelint
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Codacy?
What is Stylelint?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Codacy?
What companies use Stylelint?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+8